Planning Commission Meeting — Thu, Sep 3, 2026 · 7.a Case #2025-11753.1802, 1750 Cerrillos Rd, 1361 Fourth St, and 3 RD Berry Ave Development Plan. (POSTPONED FROM AUGUST 6, 2026)
03 - Cases 2025-11753 - 2025-11756 - 1802 Cerrillos Attachment A - 08 17 26

Santa Fe Minutes document ID: 11337
Government source ID: 11337
Original filename: 03 - Cases 2025-11753 - 2025-11756 - 1802 Cerrillos Attachment A - 08 17 26
Meeting ID: 1302
Agenda item ID: 22094
SHA-256: 4284882c5302ff4acd07bee10567963ed6a3d952307049154e6131c17d6d0021
Revision: 1
First discovered: 2026-09-15T23:50:37.602Z
Last checked: 2026-09-22T00:15:36.488Z
Extracted text

Attachment A
Conditions of Approval and
Technical Corrections
1. Table of Conditions of Approval
2. Table of Technical Corrections
3. Development Review Team Compiled Comments

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Conditions of Approval & Technical Corrections
Conditions of Approval
# Condition of Approval Dept. or
Division To be completed:
1 DP-100: I don’t see PUD as part of your zoning on the City
GIS. Please provide the PUD ordinance if located within one.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
2 Create a cover sheet for development plan (use page 1 of
the attached template for reference on what should be
included)
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
3 Consolidate all lots of Block 2 in “The Capital Land and
Townsite Co. Addition to Santa Fe NM”
Planning Prior to Recordation
4 Consolidate Lots 13-20 of Block 3 in “The Capital Land and
Townsite Co. Addition to Santa Fe NM”
Planning Prior to Recordation
5 Provide proof of ownership of the alley in Block 3 Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
6 Provide appropriate documentation connecting Lot 1 to the
rest of the Development Plan in perpetuity
Planning Prior to Recordation
7 Edit application letters and responses to approval criteria
for both applications to make sure all references are to the
old code sections & change all ‘CUA’ references to Special
Use Permit (SUP). This is because your application was
received before the new code became effective.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
8 Sign dimensions proposed in architectural plans are too
large per 14-8.10(G)(8)(a): “For C-2, SC, and I properties
located within the Cerrillos Road highway corridor
protection district, the following standards shall apply: For
one business establishment on a legal lot of record, not
more than three signs are allowed, no one of which shall
exceed fifty (50) square feet in area in corridor zone one.
The total allowable sign area for all three signs shall not
exceed
one hundred fifty (150) square feet.” Revise sign sizing to
meet this code criteria.
Planning At time of Sign Permit
9 Delete list of Conditions of Approval on DP-102101 for now.
I will let you know what conditions should be on there after
we go to Planning Commission
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
10 Fence around Site 2 mini storage units shall provide a visual
buffer or screen and be constructed of opaque materials per
SFCC 14-6.2(D)(3). Provide an elevation/detail of the
proposed fencing material.
Planning Prior to Recordation
11 Is fence 6 or 8 feet tall? DP says 6 ft and architectural plans
say 8ft. Please revise to match.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
12 Architectural plans need to be updated to match revised
building placement on Site 2 for setbacks. Site 2 setbacks
are incorrectly described in “Site Plan Data” on A.101. “Side
(South)” should say “Side (West).” Please also remove 15’
west side setback line on drawings for site 2.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Conditions of Approval
# Condition of Approval Dept. or
Division To be completed:
13 Architectural plans showing the layout/number of storage
units on each floor is missing in new set. Please add this
back in.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
14 A mural is included in the architectural renderings, but not
architectural elevations. Please revise to match
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
15 Provide architectural elevations for buildings 2, 3, and 4 Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
16 Is this project planned to be built in phases? If so, provide a
phasing plan.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
17 Please clarify ‘by others’ site work on plans to identify who
will perform the work.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED. Applicant is to
do work)
18 An approved Water Plan will be required for all new public
water infrastructure and fire services.
Water
Engineeri
ng
Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
19 An approved Agreement to Construct and Dedicate
(ACD) will be required with the Water Division for all new
public water infrastructure and fire services.
Water
Engineeri
ng
Prior to Building Permit
20 A separate irrigation meter will be required if the total
landscaped area is 1,000 square feet or greater. An
approved backflow prevention device shall be installed
beyond the meter on any new irrigation service.
Water
Engineeri
ng
At Time of Development
21 Any re-grading of site over existing water mains shall
maintain a minimum of 4 feet of cover and not exceed 5
feet of cover. Depth of existing main to be adjusted to
maintain a
minimum of 4 feet of cover and not exceed 5 feet of cover if
site grading impacts these depth requirements.
Water
Engineeri
ng
At Time of Development
22 An approved Development Water Budget including a 9.8%
contingency per SFCC 14-7.7 will be required. A technical
evaluation request for a Development Water Budget needs
to be submitted to the City Water Division for review.
Water
Resource
s
Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
23 An applicant may choose to develop a detailed, alternative
Development Water Budget for the development project
supported by reliable data that demonstrates that the
anticipated annual water use will be less than if based on
the Water Division’s standard formulas per SFCC 14-7.7(D)
(2).
Water
Resource
s
Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
24 An Agreement to Construct and Dedicate (ACD) from the
Water Division will be required for all new public water
infrastructure or fire services. An approved Development
Water Budget, including Landscape Irrigation Budget and a
9.8% Contingency is required prior to processing the ACD.
Water
Resource
s
Prior to Building Permit
25 Each lot shall be served by separate water service at the
time of development.
Water
Resource
s
Prior to Building Permit

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Conditions of Approval
# Condition of Approval Dept. or
Division To be completed:
26 An agreement for metered service (AMS) will be required to
install new services, including water offset fees.
Water
Resource
s
Prior to Building Permit
27 Developer should provide certification that its engineers
have provided NMDOT project development engineers
opportunity to review site plans in accordance with the
departments proposed redesign and reconstruction of
Cerrillos Rd.
Traffic Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
28 A detailed signage and striping plan for all required on-street
signage, pavement markings, and any related
regulatory/directional sign shall be submitted for review and
approval by Public Works
Traffic Prior to Building Permit
29 No further review required unless a future proposed utility
plan exceeds 550-linear feet of utility lines
Archaeol
ogy
-
30 Shall reference correct year of IFC (C-100) and Appendix B
for average-sprinkler reduction (FC-101)
Fire Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
31 The public right-of-way will be constructed in accordance
with the approved Public Works project S100681 (NM
14/Cerrillos Road), including a 5-foot stamped concrete
buffer and a full 6-foot sidewalk.
Parks and
Open
Space
Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
32 Provide discussion in the drainage narrative of how the
stormwater will be directed to the ponding areas. Include
how water will be directed from roof drains.
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
33 Provide flow directional arrows on grading and drainage plan
especially showing flow from roof drains to ponding areas.
Ponding area volumes must be established for each
ponding area showing dimensions. Label each pond with a
pond number and the volume. Depressed areas for all
landscaped areas are encouraged, but the official ponding
areas for the required storage must be verifiable in the
future. The conveyance of water to those areas must be
shown on the plans and verifiable in the future. Show curb
cuts for water to enter landscaped areas.
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
34 Include pond sections and show how ponds will overflow. Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
35 Sidewalk should align with Cerrillos Road Plan specs and
city street design standards which require 5’ landscape
buffer between street and pedestrian path (See comments
on plans for detail). Sidewalk width should be at least 6’, but
also made as wide as possible on Cerrillos. FHWA and
AASHTO guidance support a separated bike facility given the
vehicle speeds and volumes here. By expanding the
sidewalk to the minimum for a shared use path (10’ ) this
would better align with federal guidance.
MPO Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Conditions of Approval
# Condition of Approval Dept. or
Division To be completed:
36 Driveway conflicts on NW Fourth street should be
minimized by consolidating driveways or minimizing the
driveway width to ensure one-way circulation
MPO Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
37 Ensure safe pedestrian access to site from each street
frontage and sidewalk and also between all 3 parcels. How
are conflicts between cars and pedestrians crossing 4th
from parking on site 1 to site 2 going to be managed and
minimized? Crosswalk should be setback from driveways at
least 20 ft.
MPO Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
38 Pedestrian Access Routes should aim for right angles.
Skewed angles can be challenging for wheelchairs to
maneuver safely. Minimize awkward angles and ensure
there is sufficient landing pad for maneuvering
MPO Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
39 Provide conversations with NMDOT so City staff can better
understand NMDOT recommendations for this project.
MPO Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
40 Shall comply with the most currently adopted International
Fire Code (IFC) and adopted city ordinances upon building
permit approval
Fire Prior to Building Permit
41 Shall maintain access to apparatus access roads in and
around construction sites in compliance with IFC 2021,
Chapter 33 Fire Safety, and During Construction and
Demolition.
Fire During Construction
42 Shall confirm construction timing coordination with
NMDOT.
Planning Prior to Building Permit
43 The applicant will provide a full Construction Staging Plan
for Land Use approval. Given the proximity of the
proposed worksite to high-traffic areas, a controlled
construction plan is required prior to recordation.
Planning Prior to Recordation
44 Prior to recordation of the Development Plan, the applicant
shall submit a mural / public art plan for review and
approval by the Land Use Department. The mural / public
art plan shall include: (1) reproduction of the existing
Empire Builders mural on the exterior of the building in a
location visible to the public; (2) a second exterior mural in
a location visible to the public, with the location to be
agreed upon by the applicant and staff; and (3)
confirmation that the artist or artists hired to complete
both murals will be residents of Santa Fe. The mural / public
art plan shall identify mural locations, dimensions, artist(s),
materials, and maintenance responsibility. Final
implementation shall be consistent with the approved
Development Plan, applicable conditions of approval, and
applicable City requirements.
Planning
Commission
/ Land Use
Department
Prior to Recordation
Technical Corrections
# Technical Correction Dept. or To be completed:

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Division
1 DP-100: Existing conditions plan should be line work, not an
image (Images get difficult to read when copying)
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
2 DP-100 – Overlays: Please also list Suburban Archaeological
Review District
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
3 DP-100 – Lot Size: please break the lot size into the 4
existing lots for clarity
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
4 DP-100 – Legal Lot Information: Add book/page information
for lots. Add Legal Lot information for 1750 Cerrillos Rd.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
5 DP-100: Delineate 200ft buffer around property Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
6 DP-101: Cerrillos Rd is spelled wrong (also spelled wrong on
other sheets)
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
7 DP-101: Zoning description is incorrect Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
8 DP-101: Clearly depict Site 1 and Site 2 on drawing Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Technical Corrections
# Technical Correction Dept. or
Division To be completed:
9 DP-101: Legal Description and Site Area – description of
1750 Cerrillos Rd is missing from both of these sections
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
10 DP-101: Building Height – building height must be included Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
11 DP-101: Open Space – incorrect code citation. This code
references South Highway Corridor Protection District, not
Cerrillos Rd Overlay. Change to SFCC 14-7.5(D)
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
12 Add descriptions/dimensions of all open space provided
(might be easier to visually depict on a new sheet)
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
13 DP-101: Add clarification on the calculation of number of
parking spaces
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
14 Add Case #2025-11753 & 11756 to all relevant sheets Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
15 Add a column to architectural points analysis explaining
how you met each point designation.
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
16 DP-103: Parking – delete “parks & open space – as
determined by the city”
Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
17 DP-101: Fill in floodplain note #17 Planning Prior to Public Hearing
(COMPLETED)
18 Applicant and City Water staff will work together to address
main looping during the review of the water plan (see
attached memo)
Water
Engineeri
ng
Prior to water plan approval
(COMPLETED)
19 Existing Drainage Plan (sheet C-302) has a drainage calc.
table labeled “post-development stormwater calculations.
Verify this the correct table for this sheet and relabel to pre-
development stormwater calcs. Also question whether this
is correct table, as the existing volumes are less than post-
development volumes on next sheet, however site plan
reduces impervious area
Parks and
Open
Space
Prior to Recordation
20 Please label each pond, provide drawings for each pond
including inlet & outlet structures, storage volumes,
location of sediment measuring post, and landscape
materials. Ensure grading notes reflect plan.
Parks and
Open
Space
Prior to Recordation
21 Planting Note #1 (LP-501): This note should be revised to
reference the City of Santa Fe landscape requirements
rather than Doña Ana County landscape requirements.
Parks and
Open
Space
Prior to Recordation
22 Fencing oddly crosses retention pond (C-201) Parks and
Open
Space
-
23 The dog park should be designed and constructed to
capture the first flush of surface runoff in order to reduce
water quality impacts. As currently depicted, the grading
plan does not direct runoff in a manner that would enable
the pond to function as intended (sheet -304)
Parks and
Open
Space
Prior to Recordation

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Technical Corrections
# Technical Correction Dept. or
Division To be completed:
24 Parking lot traffic islands appear to have 60 square feet of
permeable surface. Code 14-8.4(H)(4)(IV) requires 90
square feet of permeable surface.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
25 Austrian pine at the main building at the southwest parking
space is located to close to the curb and gutter. This tree at
that location will cause curb and gutter and parking lot
damage. Adjust tree to the center of the landscape area or
choose a better size tree for this location. Entrance trees
into the parking area should be centered in the planters to
prevent future parking lot, curb, and gutter damage.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
26 The Landscape is bunched into the property boundaries,
extend the Landscape to the perimeters of the proposed
sidewalks at Berry Ave and Fifth St. Review for easements,
before plant material and irrigation location placements.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
27 Provide shrubs to the landscape for parking lot screening at
Cerrillos Road, Fourth St., and Berry Ave. per city code 14-
8.4(H)(3).
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
28 Provide frontage landscaping for CRHC zone 1 as required
pre code 14-5.5 - HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PROTECTION
DISTRICTS (B) CRHC Cerrillos Road Highway Corridor
Protection District at the northeast parking lot.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
29 Provide shrub planting within the planter bed along the
boundary wall at the northeast parking lot.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
30 Review plantings at traffic sight triangles for
height compliance for a 3–8-foot visibility
window.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
31 Utilize organic mulch within the landscape particularly at
mass plantings. Provide wood mulch shredded or chipped
4-inches in depth without weed fabric.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
32 Provide fencing information and detail. Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
33 Irrigation system design is incomplete. Provide the
remaining zone layouts.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
34 Provide the correct details from the LIDS manual for the
Manual Drain, Backflow Preventer.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
35 Provide a water budget for the first three months of the Turf
establishment period.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
36 Turf grass sod or turf grass seed mixes installed within the
city limits shall contain no more than twenty-five percent
Kentucky Bluegrass.
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
37 Photometrics do not meet Code requirements. See Article
14-8.6(D)(2) and revise for compliance. 74-points exceed
the maximum illumination for any point. (Highlighted
numbers attached are out of compliance)
Landscap
ing
Prior to Recordation
38 Include attached notes Terrain
Managem
Prior to Recordation

Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission June 4, 2026
Land Use Department Case #2025-11753 & 11756
Planning Commission Staff Report 1802 Cerrillos Development Plan & Special Use Permit
Technical Corrections
# Technical Correction Dept. or
Division To be completed:
ent
39 Current analysis shows a violation: an increase in peak
stormwater flows is not allowed per city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)
(i)
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
40 Include 2 additional drainage analysis for the 1-year, 1-hour,
and 100-year, 24-hour, required to show compliance for any
frequency storm event up to the 100-year, 24-hour. Please
See city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)(i) “except as otherwise
required by this Section 14-8.2, the stormwater runoff peak
flow rate discharged from a site shall not exceed
pre- development conditions for any frequency storm event
up to the one percent chance, twenty-four-hour storm
event at each discharge point;”
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
41 Show on the drainage and terrain management plans: roof
drain pattern and downspouts/canales, and means of
stormwater conveyance (swales, catch basins, storm
drainpipe, curb cuts, etc.) to stormwater control features
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
42 Please provide more information on how runoff Coefficients
were selected from the NMDOT Manual, include the
figure/table number, cover type, % impervious cover, etc.
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
43 Please Verify how the runoff volumes are calculated, The
Rational Method is not an acceptable method to calculate
runoff volume per NMDOT Drainage Design Manual, July
2018, section 403, Limitations: “Runoff volumes may not be
computed with the Rational Formula Method or Modified
Rational Formula Method (not included in this Drainage
Design Manual”.
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation
44 Include an acceptable runoff volume analysis for
stormwater quality volume for a 0.68-inch (90% percentile,
or roughly the 1-year, 1-hour storm) event. This runoff
volume must be contained/retained on site, to reduce
pollution per EPA NPDES MS4, see city code 14-8.2(A)(13).
This volume must infiltrate in 24 hours per city code 14-
8.2(D)(4)(c)(ii), It is encouraged that the Stormwater quality
volume design is incorporated into the landscape, to also
comply with landscape code rainwater harvesting
requirements 14-8.4(E)(1) “The landscaping plan shall
include passive water harvesting for landscape irrigation
purposes as a minimum requirement” the minimum recess
depth for retention and water harvesting areas is 6 inches.
Terrain
Managem
ent
Prior to Recordation

February 27, 2026
Case # 2025-11753 & 2025-11756
Lisa Martinez
B Constructiv LLC
3201-C Zafarano Dr #111
Santa Fe, NM 87507
Joseph Karnes
Sommer Karnes & Associates, LLP
125 Lincoln Ave #221
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Dear Lisa & Joseph,
Your application was received on December 19, 2025 for:
Case #2025-11753 & 2025-11756. 1750 and1802 Cerrillos Rd, 3 RD Berry Ave, and 1361 Fourth St
Development Plan and Special Use Permit. B Constructiv LLC and Sommer Karnes & Associates
LLP, “Agents” for Amatren, LLC, Owner and Applicant (“Applicant”), request approval of a
Development Plan and Special Use Permit to redevelop the properties listed above into a self-
storage facility with community office and gathering spaces. The property is zoned C-2 (General
Commercial) and is within the Suburban Archaeological Review District. (Alexa Hempel, Case
Manager, anhempel@santafenm.gov).
This application has been reviewed by Planning Division staff (Staff) and the City’s Development
Review Team (DRT). Attached are the initial DRT review comments including conditions of
approval and technical corrections. Additional corrections may follow throughout the
development review and permitting processes. I would like to highlight and summarize the
following key items. Those items in green font must be completed prior to planning commission.
Items in black will need to be completed at later dates (refer to attachments), but it is in your best
interest to begin working on them sooner rather than later.

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 2 of 7
A. Initial Staff & DRT Review Summary
Your development plan and special use permit applications have been reviewed by the DRT and the
following necessary revisions have been identified:
1. Planning
a. DP-100: I don’t see PUD as part of your zoning on the City GIS. Please provide
the PUD ordinance if located within one.
b. Create a cover sheet for development plan (use page 1 of the attached template
for reference on what should be included)
c. Sign dimensions proposed in architectural plans are too large per 14-8.10(G)(8)(a):
“For C-2, SC, and I properties located within the Cerrillos Road highway corridor
protection district, the following standards shall apply: For one business
establishment on a legal lot of record, not more than three signs are allowed, no
one of which shall exceed fifty (50) square feet in area in corridor zone one. The
total allowable sign area for all three signs shall not exceed one hundred fifty (150)
square feet.” Revise sign sizing to meet this code criteria
d. Consolidate all lots of Block 2 in “The Capital Land and Townsite Co. Addition to
Santa Fe NM”
e. Consolidate Lots 13-20 of Block 3 in “The Capital Land and Townsite Co. Addition to
Santa Fe NM”
f. Provide proof of ownership of the alley in Block 3
g. Provide appropriate documentation connecting Lot 1 to the rest of the
Development Plan in perpetuity
h. Edit application letters and responses to approval criteria for both applications to
make sure all references are to the old code sections & change all ‘CUA’ references
to Special Use Permit (SUP). This is because your application was received before
the new code became effective.
i. DP-100: Existing conditions plan should be line work, not an image (Images
get difficult to read when copying)
j. DP-100 – Overlays: Please also list Suburban Archaeological Review District
k. DP-100 – Lot Size: please break the lot size into the 4 existing lots for clarity
l. DP-100 – Legal Lot Information: Add book/page information for lots. Add Legal
Lot information for 1750 Cerrillos Rd.
m. DP-100: Delineate 200ft buffer around property
n. DP-101: Cerrillos Rd is spelled wrong (also spelled wrong on other sheets)
o. DP-101: Zoning description is incorrect
p. DP-101: Clearly depict Site 1 and Site 2 on drawing
q. DP-101: Legal Description and Site Area – description of 1750 Cerrillos Rd is missing
from both of these sections
r. DP-101: Building Height – building height must be included
s. DP-101: Open Space – incorrect code citation. This code references South Highway
Corridor Protection District, not Cerrillos Rd Overlay

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 3 of 7
t. Add descriptions/dimensions of all open space provided (might be easier to visually
depict on a new sheet)
u. DP-101: Add clarification on the calculation of number of parking spaces
v. Add Case #2025-11753 & 11756 to all relevant sheets
w. Add a column to architectural points analysis explaining how you met each
point designation
2. Fire
a. Shall reference correct year of (IFC) (C-100) and Appendix B for average-
sprinkler reduction (FC-101)
3. Archaeology
a. No further review is required unless a future proposed utility plan exceeds
550-linera feet of utility lines
4. ADA
a. Must remove and replace all damaged existing sidewalks.
b. Must relocate northeast fire hydrant out of sidewalk path on Cerrillos Rd.
c. Must remove and replace all existing, abandoned curb cuts/drive entrances and
replace with barrier curb. SFCC 23-3.5
d. ADA Parking stalls and aisles must be added to east parking lot for buildings 2, 3,
for the offices and restrooms.
e. Remove City of Albuquerque Civil Details Sheets # C-506, and # C-507 and add
NMDOT Series 608 in place.
f. Must bring Existing Corner curb ramps to ADA compliance.
5. MPO
a. Sidewalk should align with Cerrillos Road Plan specs and city street design
standards which require 5’ landscape buffer between street and pedestrian path
(See comments on plans for detail). Sidewalk width should be at least 6’, but also
made as wide as possible on Cerrillos. FHWA and AASHTO guidance support a
separated bike facility given the vehicle speeds and volumes here. By expanding
the sidewalk to the minimum for a shared use path (10’ ) this would better align
with federal guidance.
b. Driveway conflicts on NW Fourth street should be minimized by
consolidating driveways or minimizing the driveway width to ensure one-way
circulation
c. Ensure safe pedestrian access to site from each street frontage and sidewalk and
also between all 3 parcels. How are conflicts between cars and pedestrians
crossing 4th from parking on site 1 to site 2 going to be managed and minimized?
d. Pedestrian Access Routes should aim for right angles. Skewed angles can be
challenging for wheelchairs to maneuver safely. Minimize awkward angles
and ensure there is sufficient landing pad for maneuvering
e. Make changes as shown in redlines on plans (attached)
6. Traffic
a. See attached letter from Wilson & Company dated 2/20/26 certifying
its concurrence with the developer’s “Initial Traffic Assessment” (ITA).

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 4 of 7
b. Developer should provide certification that its engineers have provided NMDOT
project development engineers opportunity to review site plans in accordance
with the department’s proposed redesign and reconstruction of Cerrillos Rd
c. A detailed signage and striping plan for all required on-street signage, pavement
markings, and any related regulatory/directional signs shall be submitted for
review and approval by Public Works
7. Parks & Open Space
a. The public right-of-way will be constructed in accordance with the approved Public
Works project S100681 (NM 14/Cerrillos Road), including a 5-foot stamped
concrete buffer and a full 6-foot sidewalk.
b. Existing Drainage Plan (sheet C-302) has a drainage calc. table labeled “post-
development stormwater calculations. Verify this the correct table for this sheet
and relabel to pre-development stormwater calcs. Also question whether this is
correct table, as the existing volumes are less than post-development volumes on
next sheet, however site plan reduces impervious area.
c. Please label each pond, provide drawings for each pond including inlet & outlet
structures, storage volumes, location of sediment measuring post, and landscape
materials. Ensure grading notes reflect plan.
d. Planting Note #1 (LP-501): This note should be revised to reference the City of
Santa Fe landscape requirements rather than Doña Ana County landscape
requirements.
e. Fencing oddly crosses retention pond (C-201)
f. The dog park should be designed and constructed to capture the first flush of
surface runoff in order to reduce water quality impacts. As currently depicted,
the grading plan does not direct runoff in a manner that would enable the pond
to function as intended (sheet -304)
8. Terrain Management/Engineering
a. Provide discussion in the drainage narrative of how the stormwater will be
directed to the ponding areas. Include how water will be directed from roof
drains.
b. Provide flow directional arrows on grading and drainage plan especially showing
flow from roof drains to ponding areas. Ponding area volumes must be established
for each ponding area showing dimensions. Label each pond with a pond number
and the volume. Depressed areas for all landscaped areas are encouraged, but the
official ponding areas for the required storage must be verifiable in the future. The
conveyance of water to those areas must be shown on the plans and verifiable in
the future. Show curb cuts for water to enter landscaped areas.
c. Include pond sections and show how ponds will overflow.
d. Include attached notes.
e. A financial guarantee will be required for all public and quasi-public infrastructure.
The guarantee must be in place prior to recordation of development plan.
f. Current analysis shows a violation: an increase in peak stormwater flows is not
allowed per city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)(i)
g. Include 2 additional drainage analysis for the 1-year, 1-hour, and 100-year, 24-
hour, required to show compliance for any frequency storm event up to the 100-
year, 24-hour. Please See city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)(i) “except as otherwise required
by this

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 5 of 7
Section 14-8.2, the stormwater runoff peak flow rate discharged from a site shall
not exceed pre- development conditions for any frequency storm event up to
the one percent chance, twenty-four-hour storm event at each discharge point;”
h. Show on the drainage and terrain management plans: roof drain pattern and
downspouts/canales, and means of stormwater conveyance (swales, catch basins,
storm drainpipe, curb cuts, etc.) to stormwater control features
i. Please provide more information on how runoff Coefficients were selected from
the NMDOT Manual, include the figure/table number, cover type, % impervious
cover, etc.
j. Please Verify how the runoff volumes are calculated, The Rational Method is not an
acceptable method to calculate runoff volume per NMDOT Drainage Design
Manual, July 2018, section 403, Limitations: “Runoff volumes may not be
computed with the Rational Formula Method or Modified Rational Formula
Method (not included in this Drainage Design Manual”.
k. Include an acceptable runoff volume analysis for stormwater quality volume for a
0.68-inch (90% percentile, or roughly the 1-year, 1-hour storm) event. This runoff
volume must be contained/retained on site, to reduce pollution per EPA NPDES
MS4, see city code 14-8.2(A)(13). This volume must infiltrate in 24 hours per city
code 14-8.2(D)(4)(c)(ii), It is encouraged that the Stormwater quality volume
design is incorporated into the landscape, to also comply with landscape code
rainwater harvesting requirements 14-8.4(E)(1) “The landscaping plan shall
include passive water harvesting for landscape irrigation purposes as a minimum
requirement” the minimum recess depth for retention and water harvesting areas
is 6 inches.
9. Landscaping/Irrigation/Lighting
a. Parking lot traffic islands appear to have 60 square feet of permeable surface. Code
14-8.4(H)(4)(IV) requires 90 square feet of permeable surface.
b. Austrian pine at the main building at the southwest parking space is located to
close to the curb and gutter. This tree at that location will cause curb and gutter
and parking lot damage. Adjust tree to the center of the landscape area or choose
a better size tree for this location. Entrance trees into the parking area should be
centered in the planters to prevent future parking lot, curb, and gutter damage.
c. The Landscape is bunched into the property boundaries, extend the Landscape to
the perimeters of the proposed sidewalks at Berry Ave and Fifth St. Review for
easements, before plant material and irrigation location placements.
d. Provide shrubs to the landscape for parking lot screening at Cerrillos Road, Fourth
St., and Berry Ave. per city code 14-8.4(H)(3).
e. Provide frontage landscaping for CRHC zone 1 as required pre code 14-5.5 -
HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PROTECTION DISTRICTS (B) CRHC Cerrillos Road Highway
Corridor Protection District at the northeast parking lot.
f. Provide shrub planting within the planter bed along the boundary wall at
the northeast parking lot.
g. Review plantings at traffic sight triangles for height compliance for a 3–8-
foot visibility window.

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 6 of 7
h. Utilize organic much within the landscape particularly at mass plantings. Provide
wood mulch shredded or chipped 4-inches in depth without weed fabric.
i. Provide fencing information and detail.
j. Irrigation system design is incomplete. Provide the remaining zone layouts.
k. Provide the correct details from the LIDS manual for the Manual Drain,
Backflow Preventer.
l. Provide a water budget for the first three months of the Turf establishment period.
m. Turf grass sod or turf grass seed mixes installed within the city limits shall contain
no more than twenty-five percent Kentucky Bluegrass.
n. Photometrics do not meet Code requirements. See Article 14-8.6(D)(2) and
revise for compliance. 74-points exceed the maximum illumination for any point.
(Highlighted numbers attached are out of compliance)
10. Water Engineering
a. An approved Water Plan will be required for all new public water infrastructure
and fire services.
b. An approved Agreement to Construct and Dedicate (ACD) will be required with
the Water Division for all new public water infrastructure and fire services.
c. A separate irrigation meter will be required if the total landscaped area is 1,000
square feet or greater. An approved backflow prevention device shall be
installed beyond the meter on any new irrigation service.
d. Any re-grading of site over existing water mains shall maintain a minimum of 4
feet of cover and not exceed 5 feet of cover. Depth of existing main to be
adjusted to maintain a minimum of 4 feet of cover and not exceed 5 feet of cover
if site grading impacts these depth requirements
e. Applicant and City Water staff will work together to address main looping during
the review of the water plan (see attached memo)
11. Water Resources
a. An approved Development Water Budget including a 9.8% contingency per SFCC
14-7.7 will be required. A technical evaluation request for a Development Water
Budget needs to be submitted to the City Water Division for review.
b. An applicant may choose to develop a detailed, alternative Development Water
Budget for the development project supported by reliable data that
demonstrates that the anticipated annual water use will be less than if based on
the Water Division’s standard formulas per SFCC 14-7.7(D)(2).
c. An Agreement to Construct and Dedicate (ACD) from the Water Division will
be required for all new public water infrastructure or fire services. An
approved Development Water Budget, including Landscape Irrigation Budget
and a 9.8% Contingency is required prior to processing the ACD.
d. Each lot shall be served by separate water service at the time of development.
e. An agreement for metered service (AMS) will be required to install new
services, including water offset fees.
12. Wastewater
a. Response will be sent separately

February 25, 2026
Initial Review Memo for 1802 Cerrillos
Rd Page 7 of 7
Please review all attached Staff and DRT comments, revise your submittals to address those items
in green and resubmit for review. Once revised submittals are accepted, a public hearing date may
be scheduled. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Alexa Hempel
Senior Planner, Planning and Land Use Department
Attachments:
1. Planning DRT Memo
2. Fire DRT Memo
3. Archaeology DRT Memo
4. ADA DRT Memo
5. MPO
6. Traffic DRT Memo
7. Parks & Open Space DRT Memo
8. Terrain Management/Engineering DRT memo
9. Landscaping/Irrigation/Lighting DRT Memo
10. Water Engineering DRT Memo
11. Water Resources DRT Memo
12. Wastewater DRT Memo – will be sent separately

Form Updated: April
2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due
2/9/26 2/20/26

Form Updated: April
2024
Date: 2/10/26
DRT Member: Alexa Hempel
Dept/Div: Current Planning
Case No.: #2025-11753/11756
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. DP-100: I don’t see PUD as part of your zoning
on the City GIS. Please provide the PUD
ordinance if located within one.
Prior to Public Hearing
2. Create a cover sheet for development plan (use
page 1 of the attached template for reference
on what should be included)
Prior to Public Hearing
3. Sign dimensions proposed in architectural plans
are too large per 14-8.10(G)(8)(a): “For C-2, SC,
and I properties located within the Cerrillos
Road highway corridor protection district, the
following standards shall apply: For one
business establishment on a legal lot of record,
not more than three signs are allowed, no one
of which shall exceed fifty (50) square feet in
area in corridor zone one. The total allowable
sign area for all three signs shall not exceed
one
hundred fifty (150) square feet.” Revise sign
sizing to meet this code criteria.
At time of Sign Permit
4. Consolidate all lots of Block 2 in “The Capital
Land and Townsite Co. Addition to Santa Fe
NM”
Prior to Recording
Development Plan
5. Consolidate Lots 13-20 of Block 3 in “The
Capital Land and Townsite Co. Addition to Santa
Fe NM”
Prior to Recording
Development Plan
6. Provide proof of ownership of the alley in Block
3
Prior to Planning
Commission
7. Provide appropriate documentation connecting
Lot 1 to the rest of the Development Plan in
perpetuity
Prior to Recording
Development Plan
8. Edit application letters and responses to
approval criteria for both applications to make
sure all references are to the old code sections
& change all ‘CUA’ references to Special Use
Permit (SUP). This is because your application
was received before the new code became
Prior to Public Hearing

Form Updated: April
2024
effective.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. DP-100: Existing conditions plan should be line
work, not an image (Images get difficult to read
when copying)
Prior to Public Hearing
2. DP-100 – Overlays: Please also list
Suburban Archaeological Review District
Prior to Public Hearing
3. DP-100 – Lot Size: please break the lot size
into the 4 existing lots for clarity
Prior to Public Hearing
4. DP-100 – Legal Lot Information: Add book/page
information for lots. Add Legal Lot information
for 1750 Cerrillos Rd.
Prior to Public Hearing
5. DP-100: Delineate 200ft buffer around property Prior to Public Hearing
6. DP-101: Cerrillos Rd is spelled wrong
(also spelled wrong on other sheets)
Prior to Public Hearing
7. DP-101: Zoning description is incorrect Prior to Public Hearing
8. DP-101: Clearly depict Site 1 and Site 2
on drawing
Prior to Public Hearing
9. DP-101: Legal Description and Site Area –
description of 1750 Cerrillos Rd is missing
from both of these sections
Prior to Public Hearing
10. DP-101: Building Height – building height must
be included
Prior to Public Hearing
11. DP-101: Open Space – incorrect code
citation. This code references South Highway
Corridor Protection District, not Cerrillos Rd
Overlay
Prior to Public Hearing
12. Add descriptions/dimensions of all open space
provided (might be easier to visually depict on a
new sheet)
Prior to Public Hearing
13. DP-101: Add clarification on the calculation of
number of parking spaces
Prior to Public Hearing
14. Add Case #2025-11753 & 11756 to all relevant
sheets
Prior to Public Hearing
15. Add a column to architectural points analysis
explaining how you met each point designation.
Prior to Public Hearing
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]

Form Updated: April
2024
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):

Form Updated: April
2024
(see following pages for notes required)

PROJECT NAME
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CITY OF SANTA FE APPROVALS NOTARIZED STORMWATER
AGREEMENT
Approval by Santa Fe Planning Commission at their
meeting of , 20 , as Case No. . STORMWATER AGREEMENT: PROPERTY OWNERS(S)
HEREBY AGREE THAT ALL STORMWATER EASEMENTS
AND ANY OTHER DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY AND WILL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT
FULLY FUNCTIONAL AS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED AND
CONSTRUCTED WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY
BOUNDATIES BY THE PROPERTY OWNER AND
SUBSEQUENT HEIRS, ASSIGNS, AND FUTURE
OWNERS. THE CITY IS HEREBY GRANTED THE
FOLLOWING: (1) ACCESS FOR INSPECTION OF SAID
IMPROVEMENTS: (2) IN THE EVENT OF DRAINAGE AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT
MAINTENANCE DEFICIENCY AND AFTER TEN (10) DAYS
WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE REPECTIVE PROPERTY
OWNER, TO ENTER ENTER AND RETORE FULL
FUNCTIONAL CAPACTIY OF THE DRAINAGE AND
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS; AND,
(3) TO LIEN THE PROPERTY FOR BOTH DIRECT AND
INDIRECT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH WORK. BY
SIGNATURE AFFIXED TO THIS INSTRUCMENT, THE
PROPERTY OWNER(S) APPROVE AND AGREE THAT
THIS AGREEMENT IS BINDING PERPETUALLY,
RUNNING WITH THE LAND ON PRESENT AND FUTURE
OWNERS, HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS.
OWNER'S PRINTED NAME
OWNER'S SIGNATURE / DATE
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED
BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF . 20 (OR
EQUAL).
NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
City Jurisdiction including Section, Township and Range Planning Commission Chairperson Date
CASE # Planning Commission Secretary Date
Approved by the City of Santa Fe Land Use Department:
City Planner Date
City Engineer of Land Use Date
AFFIDAVIT
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE UNDERSIGNED
OWNERS HAVE CAUSED THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO BE
PREPARED. ALL THAT APPEARS ON THIS PLAN IS MADE WITH THE
FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE
OWNER.
[OWNER]
THE FOREGOING WAS SWORN, ACKNOWLEDGED AND SUBSCRIBED
BEFORE ME BY THIS DAY OF
, 20 .
NOTARY PUBLIC
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES
CITY OF SANTA FE DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. NO VARIANCES ARE APPROVED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE CITY CODE AND APPLICATION CHAPTERS
SHALL GOVERN AND APPLY TO THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY.
2. CITY OF SANTA FE DRAINAGE:
2.1. SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
STAFF, STORM DRAINAGE AND EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF EACH SEGMENT OF ROADS AND UTILITIES. THESE
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE COMPLETED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS.
2.2. MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE OWNER. THE CITY OF SANTA E IS HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO ACCESS AND INSPECT THE
EASEMENT AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES AT THE DISCRETION OF PERSONS OR PROPERTY RESULTING FROM
THE CITY'S REASONABLE EXERCISE TO THEIR ACCESS AND INSPECTION RIGHTS.
COUNTY
OF SANTA FE
} SS
STATE OF NEW MEXICO
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS INSTRUMENT WAS FILED AND
RECORDED ON THIS DAY OF , 20 , AT
O'CLOCK M, AND WAS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK PAGE
OF THE RECORDS OF SANTA FE COUNTY.
SHEET INDEX:
DP-100 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COVER SHEET
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE
KATHARINE E. CLARK
COUNTY CLERK, SANTA FE COUNTY
DP-101 DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DP-102 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
North VICINITY MAP DEPUTY DP-103 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN
OWNER / DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: MEP ENGINEER: CASE #: 2025-010010
ABC HOLDINGS, LLC
1254 Easy Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
XYZ Architecture
1234 Best Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
MEP Engineering, Inc
52 Design Street
Anywhere, NM 87654 ADDRESS:
W E
S
Engineer Ratios
1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40. 1:50 or 1:60
LINETYPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
ROW LINE
EASEMENT
SETBACKS
SURVEYOR:
INC Surveys,
LLC 432 Early
Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
PLANNER:
Planning Expediting
234 Everest Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
LANDSCAPE:
Evergreen
Landscape 12 Peony
Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
CIVIL ENG:
Civil Engineering
25 Transect
Street
Anywhere, NM 87654
SHEET NAME:
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COVER SHEET
SHEET #:
DP-100
SHEET # OF

PROJECT NAME
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF SANTA FE NOTES
1. COMPLIANCE WITH GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG ORDINANCE SHALL BE COMPLETED
PRIOR TO GRADING OPERATIONS.
2. FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OR
CONSTRUCTED ACROSS PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS.
3. UTILITY EXPANSION CHARGES SHALL BE PAID AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION FOR EACH LOT. CONTACT THE CITY OF SANTA FE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION TO PAY THESE CHARGES.
4. EACH LOT SHALL BE SERVED THROUGH A SEPARATE SEWER AND WATER SERVICE.
5. ALL PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL RECEIVE
PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF SANTA FE LAND USE DEPARTMENT.
6. COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT COSF WATER CONSERVATION STAGE.
7. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONSOF COSF
ORDINANCE NO. 2008-02 (IMPACT FEES).
8. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OWNERSHIP, SHALL COMPLY
WITH THE COSF ORDINACNCE NO. 2002-20 (TERRAIN AND STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT) AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION.
9. BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL APPLY TO ALL PERMANENT STRUCTURES, INCLUDING
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.
10. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PROVISIONS
OF CHAPTER 14, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SFCC 1987 AND SUBSEQUENT
AMENDMENT.
11. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF EACH
APPLICABLE CITY OF SANTA FE ORDINACNCE ADOPTED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT
RECORDING WITH THE COUNTY CLERK OR SUBMITTAL WITH BUILDING PERMIT
APPLICATION THAT MODIFIES ANY PROVISIONS OF REQUIREMENTS CALLED FOR IN
CHAPTER 14, LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, SFCC 1987 AND SUBSEQUENTAMENDMENTS.
12. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 14-8 4(F) (5).
"PLANT MATERIAL STANDARDS", WHEREIN PRESERVATION OF SIGNIFICANT TREES IS
REQUIRED.
13. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT ALL DEVELOPMENT
CONSTRUCTION PHASES AS PER IFC14-19.1
14. AN APPROVED WATER SUPPLY FOR FIRE PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR
PERMANENT SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AS SOON AS COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL
ARRIVES ON THE SITE AS PER IFC 14-12.1.
15. PERMANENT TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER APPROVED.
16. ALL IMPROVEMENTS NOT MAINTAINED AND OPERATED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES OR
GOVERNMENTAL BODIES WHICH AFFECT THE GENERAL WELL BEING OF THIS
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION.
17. THIS PARCEL LIES WITHIN ZONE "X" AREAS OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE
FLOODPLAIN AS PER F.I.R.M. PANEL# DATED .
18. FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF LOTS IS PROHIBITED.
19. THE LOTS SHOWN HEREON ARE SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION,
INC. RECORDED IN THE RECORDS OF SANTA FE COUNTY, NEW MEXICO ON THE
DAY OF 2025 AS NSTRUMENT # .
20. THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF
THE AMERICAN WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA).
DRAINAGE FACILITIES DESIGN NOTE
ALL STORM WATER DETENTION / RETENTION AREAS SHALL DRAIN WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A
STORM EVENT AS PER ARTICLE 14-8.2(D)(4)(c)(i)
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE GRANTED FOR THE COMMON AND
JOINT USE OF:
A. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO CORPORTATION, (PNM ELECTRIC) FOR
INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE OF OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND
ELECTRICAL LINES, TRANFORMERS, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND RELATE FACILITIES
REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICES.
B. NEW MEXICO GAS COMPANY (NMGCO) FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
SERVICE OF NATURAL GAS LINES, VALVES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE NATURAL GAS SERVICES.
C. LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICE OF
SUCH LINES, CABLE, AND OTHER RELATED EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES REASONABLY
NECESSARY TO PROVIDE COMMUNICATION SERVICES.
D. XFINITY &/OR LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE INSTALATION, MAINTENANCE, AND
SERVICE OF SUCH LINES, CABLE, AND OTHER RELATED EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE CABLE SERVICES.
E. CITY OF SANTA FE (PUBLIC WATER AND PRIVATE SEWER) FOR THE INSTALLATION,
MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE OF LIES AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES
REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS.
INCLUDED IS THE RIGHT TO BUILD, REBUILD, CONSTRUCT, RECONSTRUCT,
LOCATE,RELOCATE, WITHIN THE EASEMENT, CHANGE, REMOVE, REPLACE, MODIGY, RENEW,
OPERATE AND MAINTAIN FACILITIES FOR PURPOSES DESCRIBED ABOVE, TOGETHER WITH
FREE ACCESS TO, FROM, AND OVER SAID EASEMENTS, WITH THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE OF
GOING UPON, OVER AND ACROSS ADJOINING LANDS OF GRANTER FOR THE PURPOSE SET
FORTH HEREIN AND WITH THE RIGHT TO UTILIZE THE RIGH-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT TO
EXTEND SERVICES TO CUSTOMERS OF GRANTEE, INCLUDING SUFFICIENT WORKING AREA
SPACE FOR ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS, WITH THE RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE TO TRIM AND
REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, OR BUSHES WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE PURPOSES SET FORTH
HEREIN. NO BUILDING, SIGN, POOL (ABOVEGROUND OR SUBSURFACE), HOT TUB, CONCRETE
OR WOOD POOL DECKING, OR OTHER STRUCTURE SHALL BE ERECTED OR CONSTRUCTED
ON SAID EASEMENTS, NOR SHALL ANY WELL BE DRILLED OR OPERATED THEREON.
EASEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC, TRANSFORMERS / SWITCHGEARS, AS INSTALLED, SHALL
EXTEND TEN (10) FEET IN FRONT OF TRANSFORMER / SWITCHGEAR GEARS AND FIVE (5)
FEET ON EACH SIDE.
A. QWEST CORP, D/B/A CENTURYLINK QC FOR INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVIE
OF ALL BURIED AND AERIAL COMMUNICATION LINES AND OTHER RELATED EQUIPMENT
AND FACILITIES REASONABLY NECESSARY TO PROVIDE COMMUNICATION SERVICES,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ABOVE GROUND PEDESTAL AND CLOSURES. THIS
PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR EASEMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THE SIGNING OF THIS
PLAT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY GUARANTEE TELEPHONE SERVICES TO THE
DEVELOPMENT.
UTILITY DISCLAIMER:
IN APPROVING THIS PLAT, PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO (PNM) AND NEW
MEXICO GAS COMPANY (NMGC) DID NOT CONDUCT A TITLE SEARCH OF THE PROPERTIES
SHOWN HEREON. CONSEQUENTLY, PNM AND NMGC DO NOT WAIVE OR RELEASE ANY
EASEMENT OR EASEMENT RIGHTS WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN GRANTED BY PRIOR PLAT,
REPLAT OR OTHER DOCUMENT AND WHICH ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED AND SHOWN
ON THIS PLAT.
DUST CONTROL
ALL ON-SITE SOIL DISTURBING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE ADDRESSED AND
PROVIDE MEASURES TO MITIGATE OR CONTROL DUST FROM BEING TRANSPORTED OFFSITE
AND POLLUTING NEIGHBOING PROPERTIES. ANY PERSON, OWNER, CONTRACTOR OR
OPERATOR WHO CONDUCTS EARTHMOVING AND/OR DUST GENERATING ACTIVITIES IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) IN ORDER TO
MITIGATE OFF-PROPERTY TRANSPORT OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS. A PLAN, OR
STORMWATER PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) WHEN APPLICABLE, LISTING BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES (BMPS), SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR THEIR DESIGNEE FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THE APPROVED BMPS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE GRADED AND/OR
DISTURBED SOIL IN ORDER TO STABILIZE THE SITE. THE INITIAL BMP SHALL ADDRESS HOW
THE CONTRACTOR WILL MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED SOIL, AND HOW THE
CONTRACTOR WILL STABILIZE THE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA EXPOSED TO WIND OR
VEHICLE TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
WATER DIVISION:
1. AN APPROVED WATER PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW PUBLIC WATER INFRASTRUCTURE AND FIRE SERVICES.
2. AN APPROVED AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND DEDICATE (ACD) WILL BE REQUIRED FOR NEW PUBLIC WATER
INFRASTRUCTURE AND FIRE SERVICES
3. ANY RE-GRADING OF SITE OVER EXISTING WATER MAINS SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET OF COVER AND NOT EXCEED 5
FEET OF COVER. DEPTH OF EXISTING MAIN TO BE ADJUSTED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET OF COVER AND NOT EXCEED
5 FEET OF COVER IF SITE GRADING IMPACTS THESE DEPTH REQUIREMENTS.
4. A SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER WILL BE REQUIRED IF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA IS 1,000 SQUARE FEET OR GREATER. AN
APPROVED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE SHALL ALSO BE INSTALLED BEYOND THE METER ON ANY NEW IRRIGATION
SERVICE.
MPO:
1. ADD A MIDBLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OF SOUTH MEADOWS BETWEEN PRIMO COLORES AND GALLERIA GRANDE OR
ANOTHER SIMILAR LOCATION.
2. REDUCE THE RIGHT TURN LANE LENGTHS FROM SOUTH MEADOWS TO AVENIDA DE LOS PRADOS AND CAMINO DEL LLANO TO A
MAXIMUM OF 70 FEET.
3. COMBINE THE EXITING RIGHT AND LEFT LANES ON CAMINO DEL LLANO INTO ONE SINGULAR EXITING LANE IF THE
INTERSECTION CAN STILL PERFORM WITH A LEVEL OF SERVICE OF E OR HIGHER.
4. REDUCE THE LANE WIDTHS OF THE 60' ROW SECTION TO 10'.
5. REDUCE CURB RADII AT INTERSECTIONS WITHOUT BULB-OUTS TO THE MINIMUM SIZE THAT STILL ALLOWS VEHICLES TO TURN
WITHOUT CROSSING THE CENTERLINE.
6. ADD SPEED HUMPS TO THE NORTH/SOUTH STRETCH OF CAMINO DEL LLANO, INCLUDING A RAISED CROSSWALK AT AVENIDA
DE LOS PRADOS
7. ADD A CROSSWALK ACROSS CAMINO DEL LLANO FOR FUTURE RESIDENTS OF THE CONDOS TO SAFELY CROSS.
8. REDUCE THE INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT STREET SPEED LIMIT TO 20 MPH
9. MEET WITH CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO DISCUSS REASONING FOR A THREE-WAY STOP AT AVENIDA DE LOS PRADOS AND
CALLE CAMPO, OR MAKE IT A TWO-WAY STOP.
TERRAIN MANAGEMENT:
1. THERE ARE SERIOUS CONCERNS REGARDING THE PONDING AREA THAT WAS TO BE A WATER HARVESTING AMENITY TO
INCLUDE RAIN GARDENS AND PERMACULTURE. THE LARGE OPEN POND DESIGN DOES NOT PRESENT ANY OF THE ORIGINAL
OBJECTIVES. IN ADDITION, THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS WITH HOW THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CAN MAINTAIN
THE REQUIRED FEATURES IN THEIR DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION
2. INCLUDE MANAGEMENT OF STORMWATER BEFORE IT LEAVES THE PROPERTY AND GETS TO THE POND/RAIN GARDEN. THERE
SHOULD BE MANAGEMENT OF STORMWATER THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SUCH AS RAIN GARDENS FLOWING THROUGH THE
PARKWAYS.
3. THE TERRAIN MANAGEMENT REPORT CONTAINS NO EASILY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION ON WHAT IMPERVIOUS AREAS WERE
ASSUMED FOR ANY OF THE SITE. IS ONSITE PONDING REQUIRED FOR EACH LOT? WAS ANY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE INCLUDED
FOR EACH LOT? WAS ANY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE FOR PHASE 2 INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS? WHAT IS THE POND VOLUME
REQUIRED? INCLUDE THESE DISCUSSIONS.
4. IT APPEARS THAT PARKING IS ONLY ALLOWED ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET AND IS NOT ALLOWED ON CURVES. PLEASE
INCLUDE NO PARKING SIGNS THROUGHOUT THIS DEVELOPMENT. INCLUDE SIGNS WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROWS FOR NO
PARKING AND “NO PARKING BETWEEN SIGNS” FOR LONGER STRETCHES.PRIOR TO RECORDATION.
5. PROVIDE DETAIL OF POND OVERFLOW ARMORING ON BERM EVEN THOUGH IT SHOULDN'T OVERTOP UP TO THE 1000-YEAR
STORM EVENT.3. PROVIDE DETAILS OF DRAINAGE UNDER SIDEWALKS AND THROUGH PLANTER STRIPS.
6. ROADWAYS MUST BE 2” OF SPIII UNDER 2” OF SPIV.
7. STRIPING AND LIGHTING: PLEASE CONFIRM WITH PUBLIC WORKS IF THEY AGREE WITH THE STRIPING BETWEEN PARKING
AREAS AND ROADWAY. ALSO CONFIRM LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. THERE SHOULD BE LIGHTING PROVIDED AT ALL
INTERSECTIONS.
8. OTHER COMMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
WASTEWATER:
1. NEED TO ADD A NEW SHEET 4-11A WHICH SHOWS ALL THE LANDSCAPING TREES AND THE 20 FOOT WIDE SEWER EASEMENT
WITHOUT ALL THE SOIL TYPES SO THAT WE CAN SEE THE PROXIMITY OF THE TREES TO BE PLANTED IN RELATION TO THE
SEWER EASEMENT BOUNDARY WITHOUT ALL THE OTHER CLUTTER
2. SHOW THE LOCATION AND THE HORIZONTAL DISTANCES BETWEEN THE WATER, SEWER, AND STORMWATER SEWER IN THE
TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTIONS FOR THE 50- AND 60-FOOT ROW
3. SHOW THE DISTANCES BETWEEN THE WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER PIPES IN THE P&P SHEETS
CASE #: 2025-010010
ADDRESS:
SHEET NAME:
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CONDITIONS & NOTES
SHEET #:
DP-101SHEET # OF
Company Title Block with Company
Name, Company Address, Sheet Title

PROJECT NAME
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
Company Title Block with Company
Name, Company Address, Sheet
Title
PROPERTY INFORMATION
ZONING:
OVERLAYS:
HISTORIC STATUS:
NATIONAL REGISTRY:
LOT SIZE:
EXISTING STRUCTURE SQ. FT.:
EXISTING UTILITIES:
FLOOD ZONE:
LEGAL LOT INFORMATION
RECORDING INFORMATION DESCRIBING CITY RECOGNIZED LEGAL LOT OF
RECORD
North
CASE #: 2025-010010
W E LINETYPE LEGEND
ADDRESS:
SHEET NAME:
EXISTING
CONDITIONS PLAN
SHEET #:
DP-102SHEET # OF
PROPERTY LINE
S ROW LINE
EASEMENT
Engineer Ratios
1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40. 1:50 or 1:60 SETBACKS

PROJECT NAME
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SITE DATA & BUILDING INFO
Company Title Block with
Company Name, Company
Address, Sheet Title
PROJECT SITE:
Acerage: 4.8 acres
Flood Plain: N/A
Flood Way Square Feet: N/A
Net Acreage: 4.8 acres
Peralta. Elsewhere in the subdistrict there
are no required yards.
SETBACK:
Average of the Block
ZONING: BCDMAR (Busines Capitol OPEN SPACE:
District Marcy Subdistrict) 10% of the lot area
OVERLAY ZONING: LANDSCAPE:
Downtown and Eastside Historic District Landscape treatment required in yards and
Historic Downtown Archaeological Review open space. Street trees and landscape
District treatment required if planting strip exists.
Asphalt or concrete pavement prohibited in
BUILDINGS: planting strip.
Building A: 8,000 Sq.Ft.
Building B: 30,000 Sq.Ft. HEIGHT OF WALLS AND FENCES:
Building C: 8,000 Sq.Ft. Maximum 4'.
HEIGHT: PLACEMENT OF OFF STREET
Marcy Subdistrict Maximum Height: 42' PARKING:
Downtown and Eastside Historic District: Parking set to the rear of the property
14 Required parking for
Building A: 14' Commercial Use: 350:1
Building B: 14' 46,000 gross square feet
Building C: 14' 44 square feet Net leasable
Required Parking -
LOT COVERAGE: 132 Parking Spaces
Marcy Subdistrict: No Requirement Provided Parking =
294 Parking Spaces
BUILDING PLACEMENT: ADA Parking Spaces
Front required yard equal to the average = 8 ADA Parking Spaces
depth of existing front yards on the block ADA Van Accessible
shall be required for (a) the east side of = 2 Parking Spaces
Washington Avenue between Palace
Avenue and Paseo de Peralta (Hillside); PORTALS IN THE ROW:
and the west side of Grant Avenue None
between Palace Avenue and Paseo de
GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG NOTE
THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE GUNNISON'S PRAIRIE DOG
ORDINANCE (ARTICLE 14-8.12).
DRAINAGE FACILITIES DESIGN NOTE
ALL STORM WATER DETENTION / RETENTION AREAS SHALL DRAIN WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A
STORM EVENT AS PER ARTICLE 14-8.2(D)(4)(c)(i)
KEYED NOTES XX
1. PROPERTY LINE 12. PERIMETER FENCE / WALL
2. VEHICLE ENTRANCE 13. OPEN SPACE
3. FIRE HYDRANT 14. BIKE RACK
4. FIRELANE 15. WALL SIGN & ADDRESS
5. 5 FOOT CONCRETE WALK 16. EV CHARGING STATION
North
GENERAL NOTES 6. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
7. ASPHALT PAVEMENT
1. SOLID WASTER COLLECTION WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SANTA FE. 8. ADA COMPLIANT PARKING
9. ADA COMPLIANT RAMP
10. ADA CROSSWALK
11. REFUSE ENCLOSURE
2. EXTERIOR LUMINARIES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 14-8.9 SFCC.
3. THE SITE SHALL COMPLY WITH INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (IFC) 2015.
4. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 20' AND 26' AROUND
THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING.
5. THE SITE SHALL HAVE A WATER SUPPLY THAT MEETS FIR FLOW AND HAVE A
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST HYDRANT TO MEET IF REQUIREMENTS.
6. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL HAVE A GRADE NO GREATER THAN 10% . CASE #: 2025-0100107. FIRE LANE SURFACE SHALL BE ALL WEATHER AND SUPPORT 75,000 LBS.
LEGEND DUST CONTROL ADDRESS:
W E
S
LINETYPE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
ROW LINE
1
A
ADA SPACE
ADA ACCESS PATH
BLDG NUMBER
BLDG TYPE,
REF ARCH
PLANS
2
PEDESTRIAN
CROSSWALK
PARKING ROW
COUNT
BIKE RACK
ALL ON-SITE SOIL DISTURBING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE ADDRESSED AND
PROVIDE MEASURES TO MITIGATE OR CONTROL DUST FROM BEING TRANSPORTED OFFSITE
AND POLLUTING NEIGHBOING PROPERTIES. ANY PERSON, OWNER, CONTRACTOR OR
OPERATOR WHO CONDUCTS EARTHMOVING AND/OR DUST GENERATING ACTIVITIES IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) IN ORDER TO
MITIGATE OFF-PROPERTY TRANSPORT OF FUGITIVE DUST EMISSIONS. A PLAN, OR
STORMWATER PREVENTION PLAN (SWPP) WHEN APPLICABLE, LISTING BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES (BMPS), SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR THEIR DESIGNEE FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THE APPROVED BMPS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE GRADED AND/OR
DISTURBED SOIL IN ORDER TO STABILIZE THE SITE. THE INITIAL BMP SHALL ADDRESS HOW
THE CONTRACTOR WILL MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED SOIL, AND HOW THE
CONTRACTOR WILL STABILIZE THE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA EXPOSED TO WIND OR
VEHICLE TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION.
1 SHEET NAME:
SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
SHEET #:
DP-103
SHEET # OF
EASEMENT
Engineer Ratios
1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40. 1:50 or 1:60 SETBACKS

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Initial DRT
Comments
Review
Memo
Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: February 16, 2026
DRT Member: Geronimo Griego, Fire Marshal
Dept/Div: Fire Prevention Division
Case No.: 2025-11753_2025-11756_1802 Cerrillos_EmpireStorage_DP_SUP
Case Planner:
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Shall reference correct year of IFC (C-100) and
Appendix B for average-sprinkler reduction
(FC-101)
Prior to Public Hearing
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
IFC 2015 is the wrong referenced fire code. The city of Santa Fe most currently adopted fire code is IFC
2021. Also look at the most recently adopted fire code for the correct reference Appendix B Table
B105.1 (1)

Form Updated: April 2024

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: 02/16/2026
DRT Member: Paul A. Duran
Dept/Div: Land Use/
HPD
Case No.: #2025-11756 1802 Cerrillos Road
Case Planner: Alexa N. Hempel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. 14-4.2(D)(3) & 14-4.2(D)(4)
2. (3) Suburban Archaeological Review District
3. In this district, an archaeological clearance
permit shall be required prior to approval of
the final development plan or plat for the
following projects:
4. (I)All annexations, rezonings, subdivisions,
planned unit developments, or other
development requiring approval by the
Planning Commission, having over ten
(10) acres
5. (II)All city projects over two (2) acres in size.
6. (III)All city park projects over one (1) acre
in size.
(4)
Utility Mains
An archaeological clearance permit is required for new
construction of sewer mains or main lines of other
utilities such as telephone lines, gas lines, and fiber
optics, including the entire construction easement:
(I)
With an extension of sixty (50) feet or more if the main
is in the historic downtown archaeological review
district; (II)
With an extension of five hundred fifty (550) or more if
the main is in the river and trails or suburban
archaeological review district.
No further review required
unless a future proposed
utility plan exceeds 550-
linear feet of utility lines.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.

Form Updated: April 2024
2.
3.
4.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
(see following pages for notes required)

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: 2/16/2026
DRT Member: Teddy Padilla
Dept/Div: Land Use/Technical Review
Case No.: 2025-11753, 2025-11756
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Must remove and replace all damaged
existing sidewalks.
Prior to permit
2. Must relocate northeast fire hydrant out
of sidewalk path on Cerrillos Rd.
Prior to recordation
3. Must remove and replace all existing,
abandoned curb cuts/drive entrances
and replace with barrier curb. SFCC 23-
3.5
Prior to recordation
4. ADA Parking stalls and aisles must be added to
east parking lot for buildings 2, 3, for the
offices and restrooms.
Prior to recordation
5. Remove City of Albuquerque Civil Details
Sheets # C-506, and # C-507 and add NMDOT
Series 608 in place.
Prior to recordation
6. Must bring Existing Corner curb ramps to
ADA compliance.
Prior to recordation
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.

Form Updated: April 2024
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):

Form Updated: April 2024
(see following pages for notes required)

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due
2/9/26 by SF MPO 2/9/26 by SF MPO

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: 2/16/26
DRT Member: Erick Aune & Carrie Tremblatt
Dept/Div: Santa Fe MPO
Case No.: Case #2025-11753
Case Planner: Alexa Hampel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Sidewalk should align with Cerrillos Road Plan
specs and city street design standards which
require 5’ landscape buffer between street and
pedestrian path (See comments on plans for
detail). Sidewalk width should be at least 6’,
but also made as wide as possible on Cerrillos.
FHWA and AASHTO guidance support a
separated bike facility given the vehicle speeds
and volumes here. By expanding the sidewalk
to the minimum for a shared use path (10’ )
this would better align with federal guidance.
Prior to planning
commission
2. Driveway conflicts on NW Fourth street should
be minimized by consolidating driveways or
minimizing the driveway width to ensure one-
way circulation
Prior to planning
commission
3. Ensure safe pedestrian access to site from each
street frontage and sidewalk and also between
all 3 parcels. How are conflicts between cars
and pedestrians crossing 4th from parking on
site 1 to site 2 going to be managed and
minimized?
Prior to planning
commission
4. Pedestrian Access Routes should aim for right
angles. Skewed angles can be challenging for
wheelchairs to maneuver safely. Minimize
awkward angles and ensure there is sufficient
landing pad for maneuvering
Prior to planning
commission
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.

Form Updated: April 2024
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2. Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
3. (see following pages for notes required)
See City Street Standards below for sidewalk and landscaping buffer requirements

Form Updated: April 2024

10' BUILDING
SETBACK
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
SITE PLAN This many driveways so close together presents more
potenital for conflicts. Consolidate driveways or narrow
access opening to ensure one way circulation.
Pedestrian access path also needs to be maintained
GENERAL NOTES
1. SOLID WASTER COLLECTION WILL BE PROVIDED BY
THE CITY OF SANTA FE.
2. EXTERIOR LUMINARIES SHALL COMPLY WITH
CHAPTER 14-8.9 SFCC.
3. THE SITE SHALL COMPLY WITH INTERNATIONAL FIRE
CODE (IFC) 2015.
4. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL NOT BE
LESS THAN 20' AND 26' AROUND THE RESIDENTIAL
13
13
2
This is a
1 challenging
6 angle for
wheelchair
access 12
10
Street Standards requries
landscaped buffer between
street and sidewalk for
arterials and collectors
1
8
through driveway
8
More thought needs to
be put into access from
parking on site 2 to site
1. Having overlflow
parking on the opposite
side of the street with
no pedestrian crossing
facilities creates new ped
crossing demands that
need to be
accommodated
BUILDING.
5. THE SITE SHALL HAVE A WATER SUPPLY THAT
MEETS FIR FLOW AND HAVE A DISTANCE TO THE
NEAREST HYDRANT TO MEET IF REQUIREMENTS.
6. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS SHALL HAVE A
GRADE NO GREATER THAN 10% .
7. FIRE LANE SURFACE SHALL BE ALL WEATHER AND
SUPPORT 75,000 LBS.
KEYED NOTES XX
1. PROPERTY LINE
2. EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK
2 2
1 5
1
6
8 1
4
12
2 4
3
8
64' ROW
6
1
3. PROPOSED BUILDING
4. PROPOSED FENCING
5. PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING
6. PROPOSED 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK
7. PROPOSED CONCRETE ADA PARKING
8. PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
9. PROPOSED ADA CURB RAMP
10. PROPOSED BIKE RACKS
11. PROPOSED DOG PARK
3 3 1
6
10 3
10 14
4
5
16 15
8 2
6
12 17
9 3
12. PROPOSED DRIVEPAD
13. PROPOSED PUBLIC SIDEWALK CONNECTION
14. PROPOSED BOLLARDS, TYP.
15. PROPOSED CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS, TYP.
16. PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING PER ELECTRICAL PLANS
17. PROPOSED VEHICLE GATE
18. PROPOSED PUBLIC SIDEWALK
LEGEND
8 5
9
12 7
7 4
8 11 4
1 18
12
PROPERTY LINES
EASEMENTS
1
2 8
4 PROPOSED FENCE
8
1 18
2
2
4
1
18
18
BERRY AVE
2
2
PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING
PROPOSED BUILDING
PROPOSED CONCRETE
PROPOSED ASPHALT
PARKING
CASE #:
0 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
60'
ADDRESS: 1802 CERRILLOS RD. SANTA FE, NM 87505
1361 FOURTH ST. SANTA FE, NM 87505
1750 CERRILLOS RD. SANTA FE, NM 87505
3 RD BERRY AVE. SANTA FE, NM 87505
SHEET NAME: SHEET #:
SITE PLAN C-201SHEET # OF
FIFTH
ST
64.35'
SITE PLAN
4

3" 28"
3
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
SIGNING AND STRIPING - ADA PLAN
NOTES FOR PAVEMENT MARKINGS
1. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE
CURRENT EDITION OF THE MUTCD.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON
FINAL SURFACE COURSE. THE LAYOUT OF ALL PAVEMENT
MARKINGS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PROJECT MANAGER
PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION OF MATERIALS.
skewed angles should be
avoided for Ped Access route. At
the very least ensure sufficient
landing areas for maneuvering
safely
ADA curb ramps are needed at
intersections and should align with
ped access route
ACCESIBLE
PEDESTRIAN
ROUTE
ACCESIBLE
PEDESTRIAN
ROUTE 7
1
7
7
7
6
1
7
0 30'
SCALE: 1" = 30'
60'
3. ALL LANE DIMENSIONS ARE FROM CENTER OF LANE STRIPE,
CENTER OF DOUBLE LANE STRIPE, FACE OF CURB, OR EDGE
OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NOTES FOR PERMANENT SIGNING
1. ALL SIGNS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, SHALL
MEET THE REFLECTIVITY REQUIREMENTS IN THE TABLE
ON SHEET C-18 FOR THE SHEETING, LEGEND, BORDER
AND BACKGROUND. ONLY ALUMINUM PANEL SIGNS ARE
PERMITTED.
2. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS AND DEVICES
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) CURRENT
EDITION.
3. THE LATERAL CLEARANCE OF SIGNS SHALL BE NOT
LESS THAN 2 FT. FROM THE FACE OF CURB OR
SIDEWALK.
4. ALL SIGNING HARDWARE, INCLUDING BRACKETS, (FOR
MOUNTING ALL STREET NAME SIGNS, ETC.) ARE
CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO SIGN INSTALLATION AND
THEREFORE NO ADDITIONAL PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE.
GENERAL NOTES
1. AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
ENSURE ADA COMPLIANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF REQUIRED
ADA ACCESSIBLE FEATURES AND APPURTENANCES, AS
DETAILED IN, AND IN ADDITION TO, THE APPROVED
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DOCUMENTS.
2. IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH ICC ANSI A117.1-2009
CHAPTERS 1-5 AND CHAPTER 7, MUTCD, DOJ, AND NM STATE
STATUTE AND CODE SUCH AS THE NEW MEXICO ACCESSIBLE
PARKING CHECKLIST, LATEST PUBLISHED VERSION. SIGNAGE
WITH REQUIRED LANGUAGE PER THE NM ACCESSIBLE
PARKING CHECKLIST IS REQUIRED AT ALL ADA PARKING
SPACES.
3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL
NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. 1%-1.5% IS THE
PREFERRED TARGET SLOPE.
connect
sidewal7k to
access route
7
ACCESIBLE
PEDESTRIAN
ROUTE
2
1 7
2 7
ACCESIBLE
PEDESTRIAN
ROUTE 7
4. ALL WALK SURFACES ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE PATH OF
TRAVEL SHALL BE FIRM, STABLE AND SLIP RESISTANT.
SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS ALONG THE ACCESSIBLE PATH OF
TRAVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:20 (5%) RUNNING SLOPES
WITHOUT HANDRAIL(S) IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT ANSI
117.1 STANDARDS 505 2015 IBC 1014. CROSS SLOPES
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% STAFF RECOMMENDS 1% TO 1.5%
AS A TARGET CROSS SLOPE.
5. RAMPS WITHIN THE SITE SHALL HAVE 1:12 (8.33%) RUNNING
SLOPE AND 1:48 (2%) CROSS SLOPE MAX. WITH A MAX. RISE OF
30" AND WITH 5' CLEAR LENGTH LANDINGS WHERE STRAIGHT.
CHANGES IN DIRECTION SHALL COMPLY WITH 304.3. LANDING
TYPICAL SLOPE IS 1.5% AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% RUNNING
AND CROSS SLOPE. WALKWAYS SHALL PROVIDE 5’ DIAMETER
TURNING SPACE EVERY 200 LINEAR FEET OF RUN.
BERRY AVE
6. ENSURE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE(S) FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING
SPACE AISLE(S) TO BUILDING ENTRANCE ARE
PROVIDED/MAINTAINED.
KEYED NOTES XX
1. 4" SOLID WHITE, TYPICAL
2. ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING, SEE DETAIL A
3. 4" SOLID BLUE, TYPICAL
4. ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL, SEE DETAIL B
7 7 5. VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN, SEE DETAIL C
7 6. PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP, SEE DETAIL D
7. ADA ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP
5 5
3
3 * *
BLUE
* WHITE
3" STROKE WIDTH
CASE #:
ADDRESS:
8. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
1802 CERRILLOS RD. SANTA FE, NM 87505
1361 FOURTH ST. SANTA FE, NM 87505
1750 CERRILLOS RD. SANTA FE, NM 87505
3 RD BERRY AVE. SANTA FE, NM 87505 C-203SHEET NAME: SHEET #:
4 4 3" 24" 3" SIGNING AND9.00' 5.22' 9.00'
A ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL B ADA ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL DETAIL C ADA PARKING LOT SIGN D PRECAST CONCRETE WHEEL STOP DETAIL
C-15 SCALE: NTS C-15 SCALE: NTS C-15 SCALE: NTS C-15 SCALE: NTS STRIPING - ADA PLAN SHEET # OF
20' UTILITY EASEMENT
BK. MISC. 180, PG. 500
12' UTILITY EASEMENT
BK. MISC. 180, PG. 268
FIFTH
ST
3"
SIGNING AND STRIPING - ADA
PLAN

=� ROP.
OP
E
RETAINING WAU lil FENCES' I
? 1�
""p""R'"o""p-""P_E"'o""E""s""TR-/A""N""'•�i PROP. FILL SLOPE
SCREENINGFENCE,
TYPE 1 PROP.
-- �- CLCONST.�T.C.P.-s_· I--- ,, J
- ----- - ,_ '
--------- ;- --
(
- - c:,c
+:,
-- - - - �
CLINTERSECTION
STA. 195+49.30 NM 14 =
STA. 10+00.00 T0-03

1�-
_L_ ...J.Jm:7"1z"j",-:,,i, ---- � :.L
�
Cl)
-
c:, c:,
l!�ER�s"Ro".il �- "� _L_

PT 6834 98 6835.48 PT 6834 90 6835 40
NM 14 (CERRILLO$ RD.} I STA. 189+00.11
LT. TO-01 ISFFD EMERGENCY EXtn
POINT FL.ELEV.ITC. ELEV. STA. 188+44.91 POINT FL ELEV. Iv. ELEV.
PC 6834.56 683500 OFF. 35.87' RT. PC 6835.65 6836.15
1 6834.59 6834.91 FL = 6835.42' j,, STA 188+59.44 1 6835.44 6835.94
2 6834.80 6834.82 (TSC= 6835.921I \ OFF. 34.33' RT. 2 6835.37 6835.39
3 6834.95 683500 (SC:6835.441 FL = 6835.n•- 3 6835.32 6835.34
PT 6835.10 6835,4-4 STA 187+88.15 (TSC = 6836.271 PT 6835.28 6835 78
OFF. 34.41' RT. STA.188+39.49
,... FL = 6834.53' � I
0-i OFF. 39.56' RT. 13
p:vr:::1. (TSC= 6835.031 12 FL= 6835.37I'""\ r:-, -
r----------''---==o+-C4 l- =:�--,, ,_, f,1 �- -[l SO TF AF .. 13887. 9+ 79 "8R. 5T,4.L ...l.. _:!,!1:_:TB�C:_:=:._:6'.:'.83:'.:5'.::.3'.:9�?le.'.-\ ---\-.\-�t..!
�:'�;;i;itn.t;PC;t�tftf�;;;i�;;;;�;;;;;;;��;;;;;;;;;;
9I -- ,-FL(T=S68C3=46.87374' .791 \ -2 /_ �,,,.--- I
;I�
� 2 �-----------S-T_A._1_88+-35_.4_3-, / ��---- 0 � to ©
u0 i ,::il:ifi.JE'1 /11:3
/4 12'
�
_====r..,_�1=3=Jr=,====S=T:A:.:1::8:7!=+=87=.t6'L3 ...::.:;;:-� ""� 11 OSFTFA. 1468.801+'0R3T..42 �
ill�
�/1/ 1 0 .........;�·
STA.188+59.44 � 3 f---OFF. 40.06' RT. PROP. 0 ,:;;;:, FL = 6834.94' 0 'x,_"' STA. 188�7.7_3 _
0FF.41.00'RT-. ---------� ,H
EXIST. SSW=6835.11' R.OW_) l!I (TBC=6834.96) #, I Pr I'---. / SSW= 6835.53'�/--,,..-"'--OFF. 42.45 RT. BSW =6836.35'
R.O.W. STA. 187+94.85 J - \ \ STA. 188+38.03 ,,,,. f\.".'i. I >"" _,,,,- - - - - - - - T - -EXIST-. 1-
OFF. 43 22' RT_, / r., OFF. 45.54' RT. - r'r / PROP.� R.O.W.-
SSW= 6834 84' \V SW= 6835.36' -L ., .i,i / STA 188+42.93 T.C.P.
STA 187+9826 l \ II � c.. @ �J OFF.45.93'RT. / OFF 4B.12·Rr
� l�· _ ir-=='L P_T...., ..., ,.-:--,�
�" ' - .._
"i(PROP. SSW= 6835.44'
t6. CONCRETEBARRIER CURBANOGUTTER TYPE0
;r')(24"
17. CONCRETESIDEWALK4" (VARIES).
LEGEND
-�--- PROP. PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE
RAILING
z
0;::
<)
::>
a::
1-
(
z/)
.
(/)
o-.J
<) ;:!:
� !:!:! UJ
'°�Cl
�g Cl::;
<O -:- 0..
a : < {
( /) (/ ) a ::
0 cc
=..J a::::>
� (.)
w
�
st
�
::;
z
TSABETSAYE. NICOl.E Cra,ingFile: J:\30900156NM14 c.ERRILLOSROAO\D4ENGll'EERING •S100680\PLANS'-2_SHEETS\S10038t2MS001.0\"3
1.Jul-25 10:52 AM PROJECT DEVELOPED BY: WSP USA DRAWING SCALE: 1" = tO' SHEET NO. 2 - 48

Development Review Team (DRT)
Comment Form
Date: February 20, 2026
DRT Member: Leroy Pacheco, PE and Phil Gallegos, PE (Wilson &
Company) Dept/Div: Public Works Department – Traffic Engineering
Case No.: Case #2025-11753 (Development Plan) & Case #2025-11756 (Special Use
Permit) 1802 Cerrillos Road (former Empire Builders Site)
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel, LEED Green Associate, Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. See attached letter from Wilson & Company
dated 2/20/26 certifying its concurrence
with the developer’s “Initial Traffic
Assessment”
(ITA).
N/A
2. Developer should provide certification that its
engineers have provided NMDOT project
development engineers opportunity to review
site plans in accordance with the department’s
proposed redesign and reconstruction of
Cerrillos Road.
Prior to Planning
Commission
3. A detailed signage and striping plan for all
required on-street signage, pavement markings,
and any related regulatory/directional signs
shall be submitted for review and approval by
Public Works.
Prior to Building Permit
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to future phases of
development of this project:
1. City of Santa Fe Building Code, Chapter 23-3.2 states that before commencement of any new construction, it is
mandatory for the owner to obtain approval from the Public Works Department for any driveway curb cut or
sidewalk crossing. This approval must be issued before a building permit for such new construction is approved.
2. Note as the public infrastructure plans move forward to building permit, these may be subject to additional
reviews and possible corrections to meet Public Works Standards for roadways, ADA, signing, striping, lighting, etc.
prior to building permit approval.

Form Updated: April 2024

Memorandum
To: Leroy Pacheco, PE COSF
From: Philip A. Gallegos, PE, Senior Transportation
Engineer CC:
Date: 2/20/2026
Re: DXD Storage ITA Review Comments
Wilson and Company has reviewed the ITA prepared by Sounder Miller and Associates for the DXD
Empire Self Storage Development located at 1802 Cerrillos Road in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition was utilized for this ITA and the number of trips
generated by this development are below the thresholds for a TIA as outlined in the City of Santa Fe TIA
Guidelines. Therefore, I concur with the findings of the report.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require further information.
Sincerely,
Philip A Gallegos, PE
Senior Transportation Engineer

1

Form Updated: April
2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details
DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due
2/9/26 by Parks and Open
Space
2/9/26 by Parks and Open
Space

Form Updated: April
2024
Date: 2/18/26
DRT Member: Melissa McDonald, Parks and Open Space Division Director
Zoë Isaacson, River and Watershed Manager
Dept/Div: Parks & Open Space Division
Case No.: Case #2025-11753
Case Planner: Alexa Hampel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. The public right-of-way will be constructed in
accordance with the approved Public Works
project S100681 (NM 14/Cerrillos Road),
including a 5-foot stamped concrete buffer
and
a full 6-foot sidewalk.
Prior to building permit
approval
Prior to planning
commission
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Existing Drainage Plan (sheet C-302) has a
drainage calc. table labeled “post-
development stormwater calculations. Verify
this the correct table for this sheet and relabel
to pre-development stormwater calcs. Also
question whether this is correct table, as the
existing volumes are less than post-
development
volumes on next sheet, however site plan
reduces impervious area.
Prior to development plan
approval
Prior to recordation
2. Please label each pond, provide drawings for
each pond including inlet & outlet
structures, storage volumes, location of
sediment
measuring post, and landscape materials.
Ensure grading notes reflect plan.
Prior to development plan
approval
Prior to recordation
3. Planting Note #1 (LP-501): This note should
be revised to reference the City of Santa Fe
landscape requirements rather than Doña Ana
County landscape requirements.
Prior to development plan
approval
Prior to recordation

Form Updated: April
2024
4. Fencing oddly crosses retention pond (C-201) note
5. The dog park should be designed and
constructed to capture the first flush of surface
runoff in order to reduce water quality
impacts.
As currently depicted, the grading plan does not
Prior to development plan
approval
Prior to recordation
direct runoff in a manner that would enable the
pond to function as intended (sheet -304)
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2. Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):

Form Updated: March 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
Date: 2/16/2026
DRT Member: Dee Beingessner, Joshua VanSlambrouck
Dept/Div: Land Use Engineering
Case No.: 1802 Cerrillos Rd Development
Plan Case Planner: Alexa Hempel, Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards if
the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant Response**:
1. Provide discussion in the drainage narrative of how the
stormwater will be directed to the ponding areas. Include how
water will be directed from roof drains.
All Comments are
Prior to
recordation
2. Provide flow directional arrows on grading and drainage plan
especially showing flow from roof drains to ponding areas.
Ponding area volumes must be established for each ponding area
showing dimensions. Label each pond with a pond number and
the volume. Depressed areas for all landscaped areas are
encouraged, but the official ponding areas for the required
storage must be verifiable in the future. The conveyance of water
to those areas must be shown on the plans and verifiable in the
future. Show curb cuts for water to enter landscaped areas.
3. Provide photometric plan
4. Include pond sections and show how ponds will overflow.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant Response**:
1. Include attached notes.
2. A financial guarantee will be required for all public and
quasi-public infrastructure. The guarantee must be in
place prior to recordation of development plan.
3. Current analysis shows a violation: an increase in peak
stormwater flows is not allowed per city code 14-8.2(D)(4)
(b)(i)
4. Include 2 additional drainage analysis for the 1-year, 1-
hour, and 100-year, 24-hour, required to show
compliance for any frequency storm event up to the 100-
year, 24-hour. Please See city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)(i)
“except as otherwise required by this Section 14-8.2, the
stormwater runoff peak flow rate discharged from a site
shall not exceed pre- development conditions for any
frequency
storm event up to the one percent chance, twenty-four-
hour storm event at each discharge point;”
5. Show on the drainage and terrain management plans: roof
drain pattern and downspouts/canales, and means of

Form Updated: March 2024
stormwater conveyance (swales, catch basins, storm
drainpipe, curb cuts, etc.) to stormwater control features
6. Please provide more information on how runoff
Coefficients were selected from the NMDOT Manual,
include the figure/table number, cover type, % impervious
cover, etc.
7. Please Verify how the runoff volumes are calculated, The
Rational Method is not an acceptable method to calculate
runoff volume per NMDOT Drainage Design Manual, July
2018, section 403, Limitations: “Runoff volumes may not
be computed with the Rational Formula Method or
Modified Rational Formula Method (not included in this
Drainage Design Manual”.
8. Include an acceptable runoff volume analysis for
stormwater quality volume for a 0.68-inch (90%
percentile, or roughly the 1-year, 1-hour storm) event.
This runoff volume must be contained/retained on site, to
reduce pollution per EPA NPDES MS4, see city code 14-
8.2(A)(13). This volume must infiltrate in 24 hours per city
code 14-8.2(D)(4)(c)(ii), It is encouraged that the
Stormwater quality volume design is incorporated into the
landscape, to also comply with landscape code rainwater
harvesting requirements 14-8.4(E)(1) “The landscaping
plan shall include passive water harvesting for landscape
irrigation
purposes as a minimum requirement” the minimum recess
depth for retention and water harvesting areas is 6 inches.
9.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the requirement and
providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement, they must indicate as much and
provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
See following pages for notes required on plat or plans
DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE NOTE
ALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY ALL PROPERTY OWNERS.
THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OR OTHER QUALIFIED PERSON.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:

Form Updated: March 2024
ON OR ABOUT MARCH 15, ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 15, AND AFTER EACH
STORM EVENT OF 1-INCH OR GREATER. MAINTENANCE OF THE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES SHALL BE CONDUCTED AND DOCUMENTED BY THE ENGINEER OR
QUALIFIED PERSON AND THE OWNER. THE OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN A FILE OF
THE INSPECTIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTION CONDUCTED ON THE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES.
WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENGINEER’S
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING:
A. FLUSH ALL CULVERTS, DROP INLETS AND DRAINAGE PIPES TO
REMOVE SEDIMENT AND VEGETATION THAT PREVENTS OR HINDERS THE
FLOW OF STORM WATER IN THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE(S).
B. REMOVE SEDIMENT IN PONDS THAT IS GREATER THAN 6-INCHES IN
DEPTH, AND IF NECESSARY, RESEED WITH NATIVE GRASSES AND INSTALL
FILTER FABRIC AND 3 TO 4 INCH COBBLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
C. INSPECT FOR SEDIMENTATION IN ALL SWALES, DITCHES, DRAINGE
PONDS AND REMOVE AND STABILIZE AS NECESSARY.
D. INSPECT FOR SOIL EROSION AT ALL DRAINAGE PONDS, CUT AND FILL
SLOPES, AND REPAIR OR STABILIZE ACCORDINGLY.
E. INSPECT THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF DRAINAGE PONDS, SLOPES, RIP-
RAP, GABIONS, DROP INLETS, CULVERTS, ENERGY DISSIPATORS, AND
RETAINING WALLS, ROCK PLATING, EROSION CONTROL MATS OR BLANKETS,
AND REPAIR OR STABILIZE ACCORDINGLY.
GUNNISON’S PRAIRIE DOG NOTE
THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE GUNNISION’S
PRAIRIE DOG ORDINANCE (ARTICLE 14-8.12).
DUST CONTROL NOTE
All on-site soil disturbing construction activities shall be addressed and provide measures to
mitigate or control dust from being transported offsite and polluting neighboring properties.
Any person, owner, contractor or operator who conducts earthmoving and/or dust generating
activities is responsible for implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to
mitigate off-property transport of fugitive dust emissions.
A plan, or storm water prevention plan (SWPPP) when applicable, listing the Best Management
Practices (BMPs), shall be provided to the City Engineer, or their designee for review and

Form Updated: March 2024
approval. The approved BMPs shall be applied to the graded and/or disturbed soil in order to
stabilize the site.
The initial BMP shall address how the Contractor will minimize the amount of disturbed soil,
and how the Contractor will stabilize the disturbed surface area exposed to wind or vehicle
traffic during construction.
Some BMPs shall include:
 The reduction of vehicle speeds: establish a maximum speed limit or install traffic
calming devices to reduce speeds to a rate to mitigate off-property transport of
dust entrained by vehicles.
 The minimization of drop height: Drivers and operators shall unload truck beds and
loader or excavator buckets slowly, and minimize drop height of materials to the
lowest height possible, including screening operations.
 High winds restriction: temporarily halt work activities during high wind events
greater than 30 mph if operations would result in off-property transport.
 Restrict access: restrict access to the work area to only authorized vehicles and personnel.
In the event the above practices are ineffective to prevent off property transport, the owner or
operator shall use at one or more of the following Best Management Practices (BMPs):
 Wet suppression: apply water to disturbed soil surfaces, backfill materials,
screenings, and other dust generating operations as necessary and appropriate
considering current weather conditions, and prevent water used for dust control from
entering any public right-of-way, storm water drainage facility, or watercourse.
 Wind barrier: construct a fence or other type of wind barrier to prevent wind erosion
of the graded or disturbed surface.
 Vegetation: plant vegetation appropriate for retaining soils or creating a wind break.
 Surface roughening: stabilize an active construction area during periods of inactivity
or when vegetation cannot be immediately established.
 Cover: install cover materials such as tackifiers, erosion control blankets, gravel,
vegetation (when appropriate), cold-millings, etc. during periods of inactivity
and properly anchor the cover.
 Soil retention: stabilize disturbed or exposed soil surface areas that will be inactive
for more than 30 days or while vegetation is being established.
ENGINEER’S STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned professional engineer in the State of New Mexico, do hereby certify that the
record information shown hereon is based on actual field measurements and visual
inspections performed by myself or under my direct supervision. I further certify that the
record condition as of is in substantial compliance with the approved grading and drainage
plan prepared by , dated .
Signature NMPE # Date

Form Updated: March 2024
Example for pond measurement post

Form Updated: September 2023
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
Date: February 20, 2026
DRT Member: Lawrence Rivera
Dept/Div: Landscape, Irrigation, and Outdoor Lighting
Case No.: 2025-11753 Empire Storage Development Plan & 2025-11756 Special Use
Permit Case Planner: Alexa Hempel, Senior Planner, anhempel@santafenm.gov, 505-955-
6661
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. At the time of development -
Development Review Process Flow Chart
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo

Form Updated: September 2023
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for details

Form Updated: September 2023
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant
Response**:
1. Parking lot traffic islands appear to have 60
square feet of permeable surface. Code 14-
8.4(H)(4)(IV) requires 90 square feet of permeable
surface.
Prior to Recordation
2. Austrian pine at the main building at the
southwest parking space is located to close to the
curb and gutter. This tree at that location will
cause curb and gutter and parking lot damage.
Adjust tree to the center of the landscape area or
choose a better size tree for this location.
Entrance trees into the parking area should be
centered in the planters to prevent future parking
lot, curb, and
gutter damage.
3. The Landscape is bunched into the property
boundaries, extend the Landscape to the
perimeters of the proposed sidewalks at Berry Ave
and Fifth St. Review for easements, before plant
material and irrigation location placements.
4. Provide shrubs to the landscape for parking lot
screening at Cerrillos Road, Fourth St., and Berry
Ave. per city code 14-8.4(H)(3).
5. Provide frontage landscaping for CRHC zone 1 as
required pre code 14-5.5 - HIGHWAY CORRIDOR
PROTECTION DISTRICTS (B) CRHC Cerrillos Road
Highway Corridor Protection District at the
northeast parking lot.
6. Provide shrub planting within the planter bed
along the boundary wall at the northeast parking
lot.
7. Review plantings at traffic sight triangles for
height compliance for a 3–8-foot visibility window.
8. Utilize organic much within the landscape
particularly at mass plantings. Provide wood mulch
shredded or chipped 4-inches in depth without
weed fabric.
9. Provide fencing information and detail.

Form Updated: September 2023
10. Irrigation system design is incomplete. Provide
the remaining zone layouts.
11. Provide the correct details from the LIDS
manual for the Manual Drain, Backflow
Preventer.
12. Provide a water budget for the first three
months of the Turf establishment period.
13. Turf grass sod or turf grass seed mixes installed
within the city limits shall contain no more than
twenty-five percent Kentucky Bluegrass.
14. Photometrics do not meet Code requirements.
See Article 14-8.6(D)(2) and revise for compliance.
74-points exceed the maximum illumination for any
point. (Highlighted numbers attached are out of
compliance)
STAFF RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE
ADDITIONAL SUBMITTALS
UPON RECEIVING REVISIONS.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
(see following pages for notes required)

0.0
0.0
0.
1
0.
3
0.1 0.
2
0.
5
0.
8
0.
5
0.
8
1.0
1.
1.2
1.
1.3
1.
1.4
2.
1.
4
1.
5
1.8 1.7
1.
6
1.
7
1.
5
1.
7
1.4
1.
1.
4
1.6
1.
5
1.6
1.
5
1.6
1.
4
1.
7
1.
4
1.
9
1.3
1.
1.1
1.
0.9
1.
0.
6
0.7
0.
4
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.8
1.
6
2.
4
2.
1
0.
2 0.
2
0.
4
0.6 0.
6
0.8 0.9 1.
0
1.
1
0.
8
0.6 1.0 1.
5
1.7
2.6
1.
9
1.
9
1.
9 1.1
S
SD
0.
8
1.
1
1.
6
2.2
S
D
0.0
0.0
0.0
TELE 701.461.7222
112 No.Roberts Street, Suite 300, Fargo ND 58102
www.eapc.net
CONSULTANTS
0.0
0.1
0.9
4.4
SB 6.9
0.5
0.0
0.1
1.0
SB
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.1
0.8
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.1
0.8
0.0
0.1
0.7
0.0
0.1
0.6
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.5
0.1
3.5
S
B
3.6
0.1
1.6
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.1
1.2
0.8
1.1
1.4
1.8
0.7
1.0
1.6
2.0
0.3
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.1
0.0
1.5
0.0 DCLXIENDT SS F2 LAND,
L.L.C
0.1
0.0
0.0
3.0 3.3
0.6 0.7
1.7 SB 5.0
5.6S
B
2.7
1.2
3.6
3.1
2.6
1.8
3.2
S
C
4.4
1.5 3.2 3.4
SC
2.1 1.9
1.9
2.0
3. S8
C
2.1
2.3
2.0 2.6 3.2
SC
1.7 1.7
2.9
SC
4.5
1.0
1.9
2.6
0.3
0.3
1.0
0.1
0.2
0.9
1.5
SB
3.0
0.7
1.9
2.9
1.0
3.8 SA9.6
0.4 0.8
2.3 0.3
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.3
2.2
2.1
1.8
2.5
2.4
2.0
1.7
S2 0.0
1.6
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.7
1.1
0.2
1.0
2.0
2.5 2.8 4.4
SC
3.8 3.7 4.5
SCE
2.8 2.5
2.8
SC
4.3
3.7
1.3
1.9
2.6
4.5
SC
1.6
0.5
1.0
2.8
SB
9.2
0.4
0.6
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.5
1.9
0.9
0.6
0.8
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.4
2.0
3.1 SCE
1.9
1.3
1.6
3.1
SC
3.2
2.5
2.4
SC
1.2
2.8
SC
3.7
2.0
0.8
1.3
2.9
SC
3.8
2.0
0.9
1.8
1.8
1.3
0.9
1.0
1.8
1.9
1.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.4
3.4
SA
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.4
2.2
2.6
2.3
1.8
1.4
1.5
0.0
1.6
S2
0.0
1.6
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.3
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.0
0.5
1.4
2.6
1.9
0.0
SD
1.6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CITY SANTA FE
STATE NEW MEXICO
ISSUE DATES
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
1.9
1.4
3.9
1.9 1.0 2.4
SCE
SCE
4.3 3.7 SC SCE
0.9
SC
0.8 0.4
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.8
5.0
2.0
4.9
SF
2.2
SD
SD
3.0 2.5 1.6 1.9
SD
2.7
1.8
2.1
1.7
1.7
1.2
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.7 3.0 3.5 2.1 1.6 1.9 2.5 2.6 1.9 2.1 2.9 3.6 2.5 2.3 2.9 3.8 2.7 2.2 2.5 2.7 1.7 0.7
0.4
1.3 2.3 2.0 0.8 1.8 3.0 1.9 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.8
S 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.1 0.7
0.4
1.7 SF 2.8 2.2 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 1.2 2.5
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.9 1.5
0.3 0.5
2.3 S12.4
0.4 0.5
1.7 1.4
0.3 0.2
1.4
0.2
1.4
0.3
1.7
0.4
2.4 S12.4
0.7 0.6
1.7
0.5
1.4
0.3
1.4
0.3
1.4
0.3
1.6
0.4
2.2
0.6
S2
1.4
0.5
1.8
0.5
1.2
0.3
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.2
0.1
1.1
0.7 1.6
SF
1.5
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.4
SD
0.9 0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.4
1.4
0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.2 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1 0.1
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.2
7.1 SA 5.9
0.6 0.5
0.3
0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SD DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 12/05/2025
MARK DESCRIPTION DATE
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PROJECT NO: 20253380
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
DRAWN BY: KS
0.0 0.0
Statistics
Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min
GENERAL
NOTES
CHECKED BY: MH
COPYRIGHT:
All plans, specifications, computer files, field data,
notes and other documents and instruments
prepared by EAPC as instruments of service shall
remain the property of EAPC. EAPC shall retain all
common law, statutory and other reserved rights,
including the copyright there to.
LIGHT SPILL AT PROPERY LINE (BLDG 1) 0.1 fc 4.4 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A 1. ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING MUST MEET CITY OF SANTA FE OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE STAMP
LIGHT SPILL AT PROPERY LINE (BLDGS 2, 3 &
4) SITE (BLDG 1) - FC @ GRADE
SITE (BLDGS 2, 3 & 4) - FC @ GRADE
0.2 fc
1.4 fc
1.3 fc
1.7
fc
9.6
fc
7.1
fc
0.0 fc
0.0 fc
0.0 fc
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SECTION 14-8.9.
Schedule
Symbol Label
S1
S2
SA
SB
Quantity
3
2
3
7
Manufacturer
LITHONIA
LITHONIA
LITHONIA
LITHONIA
Catalog Number
DSX0 LED P5 30K 80CRI TFTM MVOLT SPA
HS (FINISH) / SSS 17.5' W/2.5' BASE
DSX0 LED P5 30K 80CRI BLC4 MVOLT
SPA (FINISH) / SSS 17.5' W/2.5' BASE
DSXB LED 16C 350 30K SYM MVOLT
(FINISH) DSXB LED 12C 350 30K ASY
MVOLT (FINISH)
Description
AREA LUMINAIRE WITH P5 PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE WITH FOWARD THROW OPTICS AND
HOUSE SIDE SHIELD. MOUNTED @ 20'-0"
AREA LUMINAIRE WITH P5 PERFORMANCE
PACKAGE WITH TYPE 4 BACKLIGHT
CONTROL. MOUNTED @ 20'-0"
3.' H D-SERIES BOLLARD WITH
SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION
3' H. D-SERIES BOLLARD WITH
ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION
Lamp
LED - 3000K
LED - 3000K
LED - 3000K
LED - 3000K
Lumens Per
Lamp
9026
7912
1558
1194
Lumen
Multiplier
1
1
1
1
Light Loss
Factor
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.91
Wattage
90.12
90.12
20
16
DRAWING TITLE
PHOTOMETRICS
14 LITHONIA WDGE2 LED P2 30K 80CRI T3M MVOLT SRM
(FINISH)
WALL MOUNT WITH P2 PERFORMANCE PACKAGE - LED -
3000K
- TYPE 3M. MOUNTED @ 8'-0"
1964 1 0.91 18.9815
SCE 5 LITHONIA WDGE2 LED P2 30K 80CRI T3M MVOLT
SRM E20WC (FINISH)
WALL MOUNT WITH P2 PERFORMANCE PACKAGE,
TYPE 3M OPTICS AND EM BATTERY PACK.
MOUNTED @ 8'-0"
LED - 3000K 1964 1 0.91 18.9815
0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9
2 5
1.0 1.1
9 0
1.1 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2
1.4
1.
8
1.1 1.1
1.4
2.
1.4
2.
0 0
1.1
8
1.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0
1.3
2.
0
1.0
7
0.9
3
0.8
0
0.6
0.4
1.2 2.3
1.4
2.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.9
0.8
1.3
1.0
0.0
3.5
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.
0.
1
S
2.9 0.3
0.0 0.0
0 0.0
SC

9 LITHONIA WDGE2 LED P2 30K 80CRI T4M MVOLT SRM
(FINISH) WALL MOUNT WITH P2 PERFORMANCE PACKAGE - LED -
3000K
- TYPE 4M. MOUNTED @ 8'-0"
1922 1 0.91 18.9815
1 PHOTOMETRICS SITE
PLAN
E.101 1" = 30'-0"
53 ALUZ A5-ZOZO-FLT 24" 27K-GSFL-3W
WET (LENGTH) / RSS 10'-0" POLE
STRING / FESTOON LIGHTS. MOUNTED @ 8'-0" LED - 2700K 247 1 0.91 3.08
E.101
Revit Version: 2025
Plot Date: 12/8/2025 10:44:41
AM
SD
SF

TELE 701.461.7222
112 No.Roberts Street, Suite 300, Fargo ND 58102
www.eapc.net
CONSULTANTS
CLIENT
DXD SS F2 LAND, L.L.C
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
CITY SANTA FE
STATE NEW MEXICO
ISSUE DATES
SD DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 12/05/2025
MARK DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NO: 20253380
DRAWN BY: KS
CHECKED BY: MH
COPYRIGHT:
All plans, specifications, computer files, field data,
notes and other documents and instruments
prepared by EAPC as instruments of service shall
remain the property of EAPC. EAPC shall retain all
common law, statutory and other reserved rights,
including the copyright there to.
STAMP
DRAWING TITLE
LIGHTING CUT SHEETS
Revit Version: 2025
Plot Date: 12/8/2025 10:44:43
AM

E.102

TELE 701.461.7222
112 No.Roberts Street, Suite 300, Fargo ND 58102
www.eapc.net
CONSULTANTS
CLIENT
DXD SS F2 LAND, L.L.C
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
CITY SANTA FE
STATE NEW MEXICO
ISSUE DATES
SD DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 12/05/2025
MARK DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NO: 20253380
DRAWN BY: KS
CHECKED BY: MH
COPYRIGHT:
All plans, specifications, computer files, field data,
notes and other documents and instruments
prepared by EAPC as instruments of service shall
remain the property of EAPC. EAPC shall retain all
common law, statutory and other reserved rights,
including the copyright there to.
STAMP
DRAWING TITLE
LIGHTING CUT SHEETS
Revit Version: 2025
Plot Date: 12/8/2025 10:44:44
AM

E.103

TELE 701.461.7222
112 No.Roberts Street, Suite 300, Fargo ND 58102
www.eapc.net
CONSULTANTS
CLIENT
DXD SS F2 LAND, L.L.C
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EMPIRE SELF STORAGE
CITY SANTA FE
STATE NEW MEXICO
ISSUE DATES
SD DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE 12/05/2025
MARK DESCRIPTION DATE
PROJECT NO: 20253380
DRAWN BY: KS
CHECKED BY: MH
COPYRIGHT:
All plans, specifications, computer files, field data,
notes and other documents and instruments
prepared by EAPC as instruments of service shall
remain the property of EAPC. EAPC shall retain all
common law, statutory and other reserved rights,
including the copyright there to.
STAMP
DRAWING TITLE
LIGHTING CUT SHEETS
Revit Version: 2025
Plot Date: 12/8/2025 10:44:45
AM

E.104

Form Updated: April
2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for
details DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April
2024
Date: 02/09/2026
DRT Member: Clinton Peterson
Dept/Div: Public Utilities/Water
Division Case No.: 2025-11753 and #2025-
11756
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case # 2025-11753 and #2025-11756
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. An approved Water Plan will be required for all
new public water infrastructure and fire
services.
Prior to Public Hearing
2. An approved Agreement to Construct and
Dedicate (ACD) will be required with the Water
Division for all new public water infrastructure
and fire services.
Prior to Building Permit
Approval
3. A separate irrigation meter will be required if
the total landscaped area is 1,000 square feet
or greater. An approved backflow prevention
device shall be installed beyond the meter on
any new irrigation service.
At the time of development
4. Any re-grading of site over existing water mains
shall maintain a minimum of 4 feet of cover
and not exceed 5 feet of cover. Depth of
existing main to be adjusted to maintain a
minimum of
4 feet of cover and not exceed 5 feet of cover if
site grading impacts these depth requirements.
At the time of development
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Applicant and City Water staff will work
together to address main looping during the
review of the water plan (see attached memo)
Prior to water plan approval
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.

Form Updated: April
2024
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
(see following pages for notes required)

Form Updated: April
2024

City of Santa Fe Water Division Looping Requirement
The mission of the Water Division is to provide a safe, reliable, and resilient water supply
to meet Santa Fe’s needs. In design of the City’s water distribution system, relevant
pieces of this mission are achieved by, among other things, following best practices of
looping water lines and avoiding dead end lines. These key distribution design paradigms
help maintain water quality (safe) and provide redundancy of supply (reliable). Water
distribution lines are installed by developers to Water Division specifications and
standards and subsequently maintained by the Water Division. The Water Division does
not generally install new extensions to water distribution lines.
Based on the location of this development, there is a possibility that the Water Division
will require multiple points of connection to the public water system, or to “loop” the line.
Primary reasons for looping water main extensions are as follows:
- To reduce risk to the health and safety of our customers. Dead-end mains have
less water turnover than looped mains, thus increasing the risk of bacteria
development from stagnant water. Looping mains within the system when
possible is a way to provide better water quality to our customers.
- Looping mains together provides better flows for fire hydrants in the event of
an emergency.
- Looping provides redundancy in the event of a main break.
The details of our line extension policy can be found in Chapter 25, Exhibit A, Rule 19 of
the City of Santa Fe City Code, available online. Design criteria and construction standards
are available on the Water Division’s website. Comments from Water Division engineers
are generally provided as part of the water plan review process following the submission
of a first draft of the proposed water plan. The Water Division Engineering Section also
meets weekly to discuss topics related to current developments, and developers working
on projects with the City may join these meetings to discuss project details, including
looping requirements. If you are interested in attending a weekly meeting or if you have
any questions about the water plan review process, feel free to contact a Water Division
Engineer.

Development Review Team
Comment Form
Date: February 24, 2026
Staff person: Alan G. Hook
Dept/Div: Public Utilities/ Water Division
Case: Case #2025-11753 & #2025-11756 1802 Cerrillos Road
Case Mgr: Alexa Hempel
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following are met:
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by:
1 An approved Development Water Budget including a
9.8% contingency per SFCC 14-7.7 will be required. A
technical evaluation request for a Development Water
Budget needs to be submitted to the City Water Division
for review.
Prior to Planning
Commission
packet submittal.
2. An applicant may choose to develop a detailed,
alternative Development Water Budget for the
development project supported by reliable data that
demonstrates that the anticipated annual water use will
be
less than if based on the Water Division’s standard
formulas per SFCC 14-7.7(D)(2).
Prior to Planning
Commission
packet submittal.
3 An Agreement to Construct and Dedicate (ACD) from the
Water Division will be required for all new public water
infrastructure or fire services. An approved Development
Water Budget, including Landscape Irrigation Budget and a
9.8% Contingency is required prior to processing the ACD.
Prior to
Recordation of
Development Plan
or Plat.
4 Each lot shall be served by separate water service at the
time of development.
Prior to
construction
permit approval.
5 An agreement for metered service (AMS) will be
required to install new services, including water offset
fees.
Prior to
construction
permit approval.

The applicant should be aware that the following city code provisions or other
requirements will apply to future phases of development of this project:
A. Water rights proposed to be transferred to the city's water system for dedication to
a development shall be tendered to the City of Santa Fe at whichever review stage is
applicable and occurs first in the review of a particular development, according to
the following requirements per SFCC 25-12.4:
1) Not later than sixty (60) days after the final land use approval of the final development
plan by the planning and land use department, the planning commission or the
governing body.
B. A construction permit application shall not be approved until the applicant has
dedicated water to meet the approved development water budget for the
development project plus a 9.8 percent contingency that covers water utility
delivery requirements, as documented by the Water Division designation form
and complied with the conditions thereof per SFCC 14-7.7 E1.

ACD PACKET CHECK-OFF SHEET
This sheet contains a list of required information for processing Agreements
to Construct and Dedicate Public Improvements (ACD).
*Please submit this sheet with the packet.
Check if submitted:
[X] Developer Information Sheet
[X] Utility Service Application
[ ] Utility Contractor Price Quote
[X] Copy of Plat
[ ] Approved Water Plan Drawing Number
[X] Approved Development Water Budget, including Landscape
Irrigation Budget and a 9.8% Contingency
[N/A] Fee Waiver Application Approved by the Office of Affordable
Housing
[N/A] SFHP, Not Applicable
COUNTY PROJECTS ONLY:
[ ] City Council Approval Date
NOTE:
Applications will NOT be accepted for submittal unless ALL applicable
items on this check list are completed and/or attached.

DEVELOPER INFORMATION SHEET
Developer's Name: DXD SS F2 Land, LLC
Address: P.O. Box 5587
Telephone #: (505) 303-0779
Contact Person: Lisa D. Martinez, Land Use Planning Consultant to Empire Self Storage
Legal Description of Property: 1802 Cerrillos, 1750 Cerrillos, 1361 Fourth Street, 3RD Berry
Avenue – See attached Legal Description/LegalLot of Record Documentation for each parcel
Plat Recording Date (month, day & year): Parcel 1: July 22, 1998; Parcel 2: March 31, 1978;
Parcel 3: July 22, 1998; Condemnation Parcel 4-1: July 22, 1998; Condemnation Parcel 4-4:
July 22, 1998
Record Book #: Parcel 1: Book 391, Page 028 Document No. 1033,815; Parcel 2: Book 62,
Page 7 Document No. 417,951; Parcel 3: Book 391, Page 028 Document No. 1033,815;
Condemnation Parcel 4-1: Book 391, Page 028; Condemnation Parcel 4-4: Book 391, Page
028; ALSO SEE ATTACHED LEGAL LOT OF RECORD DOCUMENTATION: The Capital Land
and Townsite Co. Adidtion Plat dated June 18, 1909 and recorded in Book 1 at Page 119
establishes a legal lot of record for each of the four parcels identified above.
Record Page #: See Above
Present Owner of Property (exactly as shown): Amatren LLC
Project Name: Empire Self Storage
Proposed Date of Completion (month & year): November 1, 2027
Developer Engineer Name: Souder, Miller & Associates
Address: 5454 Venice Avenue NE, Suite D Albuquerque, NM 87113
Telephone #: (505) 299-0942
Contact Person:
Developer Water Utility Contractor Name: TBD
Address:
Telephone #:
Contact Person:
Construction Starting Date: October 1, 2026
Type of Business Entity (NM Corporation, General Partnership, LLC, Individual, etc.):
LLC
NOTE:
1. Developer must fill out all the information above.
2. A Performance Bond from the Contractor, Certificate of Insurance and a check in
the amount listed on Page 2 of Agreement to be supplied by the Developer.
3. SDCW requires contractor bid sheets (use SDCW format)
4. Developer is responsible for advising SDCW on proposed changes in start date
to ensure availability of SDCW construction Inspector.
SDCW USE ONLY
Date Received:
Project Name:

Fire Hydrants: YES or NO CITY or COUNTY Quantity:
Drawing #:
W.O. #:
Inspector:

Revised September 11, 2014 4
UTILITY SERVICE APPLICATION
*Fill in all highlighted fields on this application. Applicant must sign and date application.
Check one only: Water Service Technical Evaluation Request
Agreement for Metered Service (AMS)
_X Agreement to Construct and Dedicate Public Improvements (ACD)
Annexation Application Water Budget
Water Offset Program/Water Rights Compliance Evaluation Request
Applicant Name: Empire Self Storage
Project Address: 1750/1802 Cerrillos Rd, 1361 Fourth St., 3RD Berry Ave Santa Fe, NM. 87505
_
*Required - Attach a Plat of the Property (legal lot of record and proposed development)
Plat Filing Information: Year Book 1 Page 119 Township, Range, Section: See attached LLOR Docs.
Location: (check one only) Inside Corporate City Limits X Outside Corporate City Limits
Property Uniform Property Code: 1802 Cerrillos: 10685824, 1750 Cerrillos: 16008891, 1361 Fourth Street:
18312262, 3RD Berry Avenue: 12776860
Existing Well: Yes No X
Legal Description including lot size: 2.72 Acres
Short Description of Project: The aforementioned properties are proposed to be utilized by DXD Self Storage as a
redevelopment of the former Empire Builders building and two adjacent lots. It is proposed as a mixed use project,
including a 3-story (basement + two levels above grade), 95,400 GSF Class A self-storage facility, community office
spaces, and an indoor/outdoor gathering area. The two adjacent lots will complement the anchor use by including a
+ 13,500 sf public dog park, additional creative workshop and storage spaces, and a new parking area to serve
tenants and visitors.
Construction Start Date: _October 1, 2026
*RESIDENTIAL PROJECT - Complete the following
1. Type of project: (i.e. Single Family Residence, Subdivision, Lot split, Apartments)
2. Total number of lots approved on final plat/development plan:
3. Total number of homes existing or under construction:
4. Size of service requested: (5/8”, 3/4”, 1” or 2”)
*Please fill in all categories below that apply for which water service is requested:
--- COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ---
Number of
Lots or Units
Water Use
Factors
Annual Water
Demand
Single Family Dwelling Unit, lot size less than 6,000 sq. ft. .15 afy per d.u.
Single Family Dwelling Unit, lot size 6,000-10,890 sq. ft .17 afy per d.u.
Single Family Dwelling Unit, lot size greater than 10,890 sq. ft. .25 afy per d.u.
Mobile Home (in Mobile home park) .17 afy per d.u.
--- COMPLETED BY STAFF ---
WORK ORDER #

Revised September 11, 2014 5
Total Total Residential Water Demand AFY
UTILITY SERVICE APPLICATION
*COMMERCIAL PROJECT - Complete the following
Type of Project: (i.e. Office, Retail, Mixed, etc.) Mixed-Use
Total gross floor area of building: 95,400 GSF Class A Self-Storage; + 12,758 SF Workshops
Total area of lot, tract or parcel: 2.72 acres
Automatic Fire Sprinkler System: Yes
Building Construction Type:
Building Square Footage: + 95,400 GSF Class A Self-Storage; & + 12,758 SF
Workshops Site Plan Attached: X Yes No
*Please check all use categories below that are planned for the building and the gross floor areas of
each use within the proposed building.
---- COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ----
Check Type of Use Gross Floor Area
Commercial
_X Office–Non-medical (within Storage Building:
Community Room 900 SF; Community Restroom 100
SF; Building 2 Workshop 3705 SF;
Building 2 Offices (incl. Restroom) 575 SF;
Building 3 Workshop 5,840 SF;
Building 4 Workshop 2,328 SF;
Restroom/MEP 310 SF;
Parcel 1: Subtotal 95,400;
Parcel 2: 12,758
Total: 108,158 SF
Medical Office
Office – City/State
Research and Development Lab
Manufacturing – Goods
Manufacturing – Consumables
Laundromat, Commercial
Laundromat, Other
Drycleaner
Plant Nursery
_ Gyms with showers
Gyms without showers
Salons
---- COMPLETED BY STAFF ----
Water Use Factors Annual Water Demand
(0.70 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(0.72 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(0.58 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(1.18 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
See attached alt. calc.
(0.21 afy per site)
(2.33 afy per site)
(0.78 afy per machine)
(0.22 afy per machine)
(0.41 afy per site)
(0.56 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(8.94 afy per site)
(0.77 afy per site)
(0.21 afy per site)
Accessory Dwelling Unit .09 afy per d.u.
Apartment/Condominium .16 afy per d.u.
Senior Complex .12 afy per d.u.

Revised September 11, 2014 6
UTILITY SERVICE APPLICATION
Car Wash (full service)
Car Wash (limited service)
Auto Repair
Car Rental
Car Sales
X Self Storage (Upper Level 30,500 SF;
Ground Level 29,500 SF; Lower Level 34,400
SF)
Wholesale, Warehousing
Industrial, Manufacturing
Church w/ day care or school)
Church w/o day care or school)
Hotel No. of rooms
Motel No. of rooms
Public Services
School, Elementary
(5.66 afy per Site)
(0.94 afy per Wash Bay)
(0.12 afy per site)
(0.12 afy per site)
(0.07 afy per 10,000
s.f.) (0.13 afy per site)
(0.4 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(applicant estimate of water
us
(1.3 afy per
Site) (0.6 afy
per Site)
(.13 afy per
room) (.09 afy
per room)
(0.53 afy per 100 students)
See attached alt. calc.
e)
School, Middle or Junior High (1.68 afy per 100 students)
_ School
Schools, Daycare (2.64 afy per 100 students)
(0.85 afy per 100 kids)
Places of Worship (0.15 afy per site)
With Daycare and school (0.95 afy per site)
X Parks (Dog Park) 2500 SF (1.48 afy per acre) See attached alt. calc.
Other (not listed above) Please attach (with attachment)
Pet Grooming (0.52 afy per site)
Pet Daycare (0.11 afy per site)
Retail, Large (0.45 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(Individual stores or shopping areas > 75,000 sq ft)
Neighborhood Center/Medium Retail (0.43 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
(Individual stores or shopping areas 75,000-25,000 sq
ft) Retail, Small (0.06 afy per site)
(Individual stores or shopping areas < 25,000 sq ft)
Gallery (0.60 afy per site)
Grocery Store (1.27 afy per 10,000 s.f.)
Restaurant (full service) (0.02 afy per seat)
Restaurant (limited service) (1.63 afy per Site)
Gasoline Station w/ Car Wash (6.56 afy per Site)
Gasoline Station (0.88 afy per Site)

Revised September 11, 2014 7
water demand calculations and assumptions used
Total Floor Area: 108,158 SF
(Parcel 1 & Parcel 2); 2500 SF Dog Park

Revised September 11, 2014 8
Total Commercial Water Demand 1.22 AFY
(See Attached Alternate Water Use Calculation)
Total Landscaping Water Demand 0.32 AFY
(See Attached Alternate Water Use Calculation)
9.8% Contingency 0.15 AFY
TOTAL PROJECT WATER DEMAND 1.69 AFY

Revised September 11, 2014 9
OWNER: Amatren LLC (Frank W. Culver)
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 5587
Phone Number:
Mobile Number: (505) 690-4833
*Only If Applicable
AGENTS: Lisa D. Martinez, B Constructiv LLC &
Joseph Karnes, Sommer Karnes Assoc.
Title: Land Use Planning Consultants to Empire
Self Storage
Mailing Address: 3201 C Zafarano Dr. #111
Santa Fe, NM. 87507
Phone Number: (505) 470-7888
Mobile Number: (505) 470-7888
Information Provided By: Check one: Owner Agent X
Signature: Lisa D. Martinez Date: Initial Application: 12/7/2025
Technical Evaluation to be Sent to: Check one: Owner Agent X
COMMENTS:
APPLICANTS, PLEASE NOTE:
 If the project is located within the Historic District and a hotbox for a backflow preventer is required, the
Historic Preservation Division must be contacted at (505) 955-6605 to coordinate the hotbox location.
 Ordinance 2008-53, prohibits new connections outside the presumptive city limits including the Agua Fria
traditional historic community (AFTHC) unless specific conditions are met. Applications for service outside
the presumptive city limits and AFTHC must include documentation showing these conditions are met or the
application will be rejected. The documents required are shown below:
o A map of the proposed project in relation to the existing city limits and the presumptive city limits.
o A detailed description of the proposed development including the type and size of proposed land uses.
o The health, safety and welfare or other legal reason for the connection.
o A site water budget.
o Documentation from the County of Santa Fe that county water service is not available, if applicable.
o Documentation from the wastewater division regarding sewer availability.
o A certified Santa Fe Homes Proposal as set forth in Section 14-8.11 SFCC 1987 if applicable.

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for
details DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due
2/9/26 2/20/26

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: 2/10/26
DRT Member: Alexa Hempel
Dept/Div: Current Planning
Case No.: #2025-11753/11756
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Sign dimensions proposed in architectural plans
are too large per 14-8.10(G)(8)(a): “For C-2, SC,
and I properties located within the Cerrillos
Road highway corridor protection district, the
following standards shall apply: For one
business establishment on a legal lot of record,
not more than three signs are allowed, no one
of which shall exceed fifty (50) square feet in
area in corridor zone one. The total allowable
sign area for all three signs shall not exceed
one hundred fifty (150) square feet.” Revise
sign sizing to meet this code criteria.
At time of Sign Permit
2. Consolidate all lots of Block 2 in “The Capital
Land and Townsite Co. Addition to Santa Fe
NM”
Prior to
Recording
Development Plan
3. Consolidate Lots 13-20 of Block 3 in “The
Capital Land and Townsite Co. Addition to
Santa Fe NM”
Prior to
Recording
Development Plan
4. Provide appropriate documentation connecting
Lot 1 to the rest of the Development Plan in
perpetuity
Prior to
Recording
Development Plan
5. Delete list of Conditions of Approval on DP-102
for now. I will let you know what conditions
should be on there after we go to Planning
Commission
Prior to Planning
Commission
6. Fence around Site 2 mini storage units shall
provide a visual buffer or screen and be
constructed of opaque materials per SFCC 14-
6.2(D)(3). Provide an elevation/detail of the
proposed fencing material.
Prior to Recordation
7. Is fence 6 or 8 feet tall? DP says 6 ft and
architectural plans say 8ft. Please revise to
match.
Prior to Planning
Commission
8. Architectural plans need to be updated to
match revised building placement on Site 2 for
setbacks.
Prior to Planning
Commission
9. Architectural plans showing the layout/number Prior to Planning

Form Updated: April 2024
of storage units on each floor is missing in new
set. Please add this back in.
Commission
10. A mural is included in the architectural
renderings, but not architectural elevations.
Please revise to match
Prior to Planning
Commission
11. Provide architectural elevations for buildings 2,
3, and 4
Prior to Planning
Commission
12. Is this project planned to be built in phases? If
so, provide a phasing plan.
Prior to Planning
Commission
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. DP-103: Open Space – incorrect code
citation. Change to SFCC 14-7.5(D)
Prior to Planning
Commission
2. Add descriptions/dimensions of all open space
provided (might be easier to visually depict on
a new sheet)
Prior to Planning
Commission
3. DP-103: Parking – delete “parks & open space
– as determined by the city”
Prior to Planning
Commission
4. DP-101: Fill in floodplain note #17 Prior to Planning
Commission
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
(see following pages for notes required)

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Initial DRT
Comments
Review
Memo
Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for
details DRT Review Timeline:
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: April 7, 2026
DRT Member: Geronimo Griego, Fire Marshal
Dept/Div: Fire Prevention Division
Case No.: 2025-11753_2025-11756_1802 Cerrillos_EmpireStorage_DP_SUP (Revised)
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel-Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Shall reference correct year of IFC (C-100) and
Appendix B for average-sprinkler reduction
(FC-101)
Prior to Public Hearing
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
IFC 2015 is the wrong referenced fire code. The city of Santa Fe most currently adopted fire code is IFC
2021. Also look at the most recently adopted fire code for the correct reference Appendix B Table
B105.1 (1)

Form Updated: April 2024

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Review
Memo Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for
details DRT Review Timeline:
Initial DRT
Comments
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due
2/9/26 by SF MPO 2/9/26 by SF MPO

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: 2/16/26 4/16/26
DRT Member: Erick Aune & Carrie Tremblatt
Dept/Div: Santa Fe MPO
Case No.: Case #2025-11753
Case Planner: Alexa Hampel
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Sidewalk should align with Cerrillos Road Plan
specs and city street design standards which
require 5’ landscape buffer between street and
pedestrian path (See comments on plans for
detail). Sidewalk width should be at least 6’,
but also made as wide as possible on Cerrillos.
FHWA and AASHTO guidance support a
separated bike facility given the vehicle speeds
and volumes here. By expanding the sidewalk
to the minimum for a shared use path (10’ )
this would better align with federal guidance.
Prior to planning
commission
2. Driveway conflicts on NW Fourth street should
be minimized by consolidating driveways or
minimizing the driveway width to ensure one-
way circulation
Prior to planning
commission
3. Ensure safe pedestrian access to site from each
street frontage and sidewalk and also between
all 3 parcels. How are conflicts between cars
and pedestrians crossing 4th from parking on
site 1 to site 2 going to be managed and
minimized? Crosswalk should be setback from
driveways at least 20 feet.
Prior to planning
commission
4. Pedestrian Access Routes should aim for right
angles. Skewed angles can be challenging for
wheelchairs to maneuver safely. Minimize
awkward angles and ensure there is sufficient
landing pad for maneuvering
Prior to planning
commission
5. Provide conversations with NMDOT so City staff
can better understand NMDOT
recommendations for this project.
Prior to planning
commission
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Form Updated: April 2024
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2. Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
3. (see following pages for notes required)
See City Street Standards below for sidewalk and landscaping buffer requirements

Form Updated: April 2024

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team (DRT)
Comment Form
Date: February 20, 2026
DRT Member: Leroy Pacheco, PE and Phil Gallegos, PE (Wilson &
Company) Dept/Div: Public Works Department – Traffic Engineering
Case No.: Case #2025-11753 (Development Plan) & Case #2025-11756 (Special Use
Permit) 1802 Cerrillos Road (former Empire Builders Site)
Case Planner: Alexa Hempel, LEED Green Associate, Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. See attached letter from Wilson & Company
dated 2/20/26 certifying its concurrence
with the developer’s “Initial Traffic
Assessment”
(ITA).
N/A
2. Developer should provide certification that its
engineers have provided NMDOT project
development engineers opportunity to review
site plans in accordance with the department’s
proposed redesign and reconstruction of
Cerrillos Road.
Prior to Planning
Commission
3. A detailed signage and striping plan for all
required on-street signage, pavement markings,
and any related regulatory/directional signs
shall be submitted for review and approval by
Public Works.
Prior to Building Permit
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to future phases of
development of this project:
1. City of Santa Fe Building Code, Chapter 23-3.2 states that before commencement of any new construction, it is
mandatory for the owner to obtain approval from the Public Works Department for any driveway curb cut or
sidewalk crossing. This approval must be issued before a building permit for such new construction is approved.
2. Note as the public infrastructure plans move forward to building permit, these may be subject to additional
reviews and possible corrections to meet Public Works Standards for roadways, ADA, signing, striping, lighting, etc.

Form Updated: April 2024
prior to building permit approval.

Memorandum
To: Leroy Pacheco, PE COSF
From: Philip A. Gallegos, PE, Senior Transportation
Engineer CC:
Date: 2/20/2026
Re: DXD Storage ITA Review Comments
Wilson and Company has reviewed the ITA prepared by Sounder Miller and Associates for the DXD
Empire Self Storage Development located at 1802 Cerrillos Road in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition was utilized for this ITA and the number of trips
generated by this development are below the thresholds for a TIA as outlined in the City of Santa Fe TIA
Guidelines. Therefore, I concur with the findings of the report.
Please let me know if you have any questions or require further information.
Sincerely,
Philip A Gallegos, PE
Senior Transportation Engineer

1

Development Review Team
Comment Form
Date: February 24, 2026
Staff person: Alan G. Hook
Dept/Div: Public Utilities/ Water Division
Case: Case #2025-11753 & #2025-11756 1802 Cerrillos Road
Case Mgr: Alexa Hempel
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable
standards if the following are met:
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by:
1 An approved Development Water Budget including a
9.8% contingency per SFCC 14-7.7 will be required. A
technical evaluation request for a Development Water
Budget needs to be submitted to the City Water Division
for review.
Prior to Planning
Commission
packet submittal.
2. An applicant may choose to develop a detailed,
alternative Development Water Budget for the
development project supported by reliable data that
demonstrates that the anticipated annual water use will
be
less than if based on the Water Division’s standard
formulas per SFCC 14-7.7(D)(2).
Prior to Planning
Commission
packet submittal.
3 An Agreement to Construct and Dedicate (ACD) from the
Water Division will be required for all new public water
infrastructure or fire services. An approved Development
Water Budget, including Landscape Irrigation Budget and a
9.8% Contingency is required prior to processing the ACD.
Prior to
Recordation of
Development Plan
or Plat. Prior to
Building Permit
4 Each lot shall be served by separate water service at the
time of development.
Prior to
construction
permit approval.
5 An agreement for metered service (AMS) will be
required to install new services, including water offset
fees.
Prior to
construction
permit approval.

The applicant should be aware that the following city code provisions or other
requirements will apply to future phases of development of this project:
A. Water rights proposed to be transferred to the city's water system for dedication to
a development shall be tendered to the City of Santa Fe at whichever review stage is
applicable and occurs first in the review of a particular development, according to
the following requirements per SFCC 25-12.4:
1) Not later than sixty (60) days after the final land use approval of the final development
plan by the planning and land use department, the planning commission or the
governing body.
B. A construction permit application shall not be approved until the applicant has
dedicated water to meet the approved development water budget for the
development project plus a 9.8 percent contingency that covers water utility
delivery requirements, as documented by the Water Division designation form
and complied with the conditions thereof per SFCC 14-7.7 E1.

Form Updated: March 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
Date: 2/16/2026
DRT Member: Dee Beingessner, Joshua VanSlambrouck (Conditions and corrections in red text
have yet to be complete) please see comments inserted
Dept/Div: Land Use Engineering
Case No.: 1802 Cerrillos Rd Development
Plan Case Planner: Alexa Hempel, Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards if
the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant Response**:
1. Provide discussion in the drainage narrative of how the
stormwater will be directed to the ponding areas. Include how
water will be directed from roof drains. Discussion not found.
Prior to
Recordation
2. Provide flow directional arrows on grading and drainage plan
especially showing flow from roof drains to ponding areas.
Ponding area volumes must be established for each ponding area
showing dimensions. Label each pond with a pond number and
the volume. Depressed areas for all landscaped areas are
encouraged, but the official ponding areas for the required
storage must be verifiable in the future. The conveyance of water
to those areas must be shown on the plans and verifiable in the
future. Show curb cuts for water to enter landscaped areas.
3. Include pond sections and show how ponds will overflow.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant Response**:
1. Include attached notes.
2. A financial guarantee will be required for all public and
quasi-public infrastructure. The guarantee must be in
place prior to recordation of development plan.
3. Current analysis shows a violation: an increase in peak
stormwater flows is not allowed per city code 14-8.2(D)(4)
(b)(i)
4. Include 2 additional drainage analysis for the 1-year, 1-
hour, and 100-year, 24-hour, required to show
compliance for any frequency storm event up to the 100-
year, 24-hour. Please See city code 14-8.2(D)(4)(b)(i)
“except as otherwise required by this Section 14-8.2, the
stormwater runoff peak flow rate discharged from a site
shall not exceed pre- development conditions for any
frequency
storm event up to the one percent chance, twenty-four-
hour storm event at each discharge point;”
Prior to
recordation
5. Show on the drainage and terrain management plans: roof
drain pattern and downspouts/canales, and means of
Prior to
recordation

Form Updated: March 2024
stormwater conveyance (swales, catch basins, storm
drainpipe, curb cuts, etc.) to stormwater control features
6. Please provide more information on how runoff
Coefficients were selected from the NMDOT Manual,
include the figure/table number, cover type, %
impervious
cover, etc.
7. Please Verify how the runoff volumes are calculated, The
Rational Method is not an acceptable method to calculate
runoff volume per NMDOT Drainage Design Manual, July
2018, section 403, Limitations: “Runoff volumes may not
be computed with the Rational Formula Method or
Modified Rational Formula Method (not included in this
Drainage Design Manual”.
8. Include an acceptable runoff volume analysis for
stormwater quality volume for a 0.68-inch (90%
percentile, or roughly the 1-year, 1-hour storm) event.
This runoff volume must be contained/retained on site, to
reduce pollution per EPA NPDES MS4, see city code 14-
8.2(A)(13). This volume must infiltrate in 24 hours per city
code 14-8.2(D)(4)(c)(ii), It is encouraged that the
Stormwater quality volume design is incorporated into the
landscape, to also comply with landscape code rainwater
harvesting requirements 14-8.4(E)(1) “The landscaping
plan shall include passive water harvesting for landscape
irrigation
purposes as a minimum requirement” the minimum recess
depth for retention and water harvesting areas is 6 inches.
Prior to
recordation
9.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the requirement and
providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement, they must indicate as much and
provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
See following pages for notes required on plat or plans
DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAINTENANCE NOTE
ALL DRAINAGE FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY ALL PROPERTY
OWNERS. THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OR OTHER QUALIFIED PERSON.
INSPECTIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:

Form Updated: March 2024
ON OR ABOUT MARCH 15, ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER 15, AND AFTER EACH
STORM EVENT OF 1-INCH OR GREATER. MAINTENANCE OF THE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES SHALL BE CONDUCTED AND DOCUMENTED BY THE ENGINEER OR
QUALIFIED PERSON AND THE OWNER. THE OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN A FILE OF
THE INSPECTIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTION CONDUCTED ON THE DRAINAGE
FACILITIES.
WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENGINEER’S
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE
FOLLOWING:
A. FLUSH ALL CULVERTS, DROP INLETS AND DRAINAGE PIPES TO
REMOVE SEDIMENT AND VEGETATION THAT PREVENTS OR HINDERS THE
FLOW OF STORM WATER IN THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE(S).
B. REMOVE SEDIMENT IN PONDS THAT IS GREATER THAN 6-INCHES IN
DEPTH, AND IF NECESSARY, RESEED WITH NATIVE GRASSES AND INSTALL
FILTER FABRIC AND 3 TO 4 INCH COBBLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
C. INSPECT FOR SEDIMENTATION IN ALL SWALES, DITCHES, DRAINGE
PONDS AND REMOVE AND STABILIZE AS NECESSARY.
D. INSPECT FOR SOIL EROSION AT ALL DRAINAGE PONDS, CUT AND FILL
SLOPES, AND REPAIR OR STABILIZE ACCORDINGLY.
E. INSPECT THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF DRAINAGE PONDS, SLOPES, RIP-
RAP, GABIONS, DROP INLETS, CULVERTS, ENERGY DISSIPATORS, AND
RETAINING WALLS, ROCK PLATING, EROSION CONTROL MATS OR BLANKETS,
AND REPAIR OR STABILIZE ACCORDINGLY.
GUNNISON’S PRAIRIE DOG NOTE
THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE GUNNISION’S
PRAIRIE DOG ORDINANCE (ARTICLE 14-8.12).
DUST CONTROL NOTE
All on-site soil disturbing construction activities shall be addressed and provide measures to
mitigate or control dust from being transported offsite and polluting neighboring properties.
Any person, owner, contractor or operator who conducts earthmoving and/or dust generating
activities is responsible for implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) in order to
mitigate off-property transport of fugitive dust emissions.
A plan, or storm water prevention plan (SWPPP) when applicable, listing the Best Management
Practices (BMPs), shall be provided to the City Engineer, or their designee for review and

Form Updated: March 2024
approval. The approved BMPs shall be applied to the graded and/or disturbed soil in order to
stabilize the site.
The initial BMP shall address how the Contractor will minimize the amount of disturbed
soil, and how the Contractor will stabilize the disturbed surface area exposed to wind or
vehicle traffic during construction.
Some BMPs shall include:
 The reduction of vehicle speeds: establish a maximum speed limit or install traffic
calming devices to reduce speeds to a rate to mitigate off-property transport of
dust entrained by vehicles.
 The minimization of drop height: Drivers and operators shall unload truck beds and
loader or excavator buckets slowly, and minimize drop height of materials to the
lowest height possible, including screening operations.
 High winds restriction: temporarily halt work activities during high wind events
greater than 30 mph if operations would result in off-property transport.
 Restrict access: restrict access to the work area to only authorized vehicles and personnel.
In the event the above practices are ineffective to prevent off property transport, the owner or
operator shall use at one or more of the following Best Management Practices (BMPs):
 Wet suppression: apply water to disturbed soil surfaces, backfill materials,
screenings, and other dust generating operations as necessary and appropriate
considering current weather conditions, and prevent water used for dust control from
entering any public right-of-way, storm water drainage facility, or watercourse.
 Wind barrier: construct a fence or other type of wind barrier to prevent wind erosion
of the graded or disturbed surface.
 Vegetation: plant vegetation appropriate for retaining soils or creating a wind break.
 Surface roughening: stabilize an active construction area during periods of inactivity
or when vegetation cannot be immediately established.
 Cover: install cover materials such as tackifiers, erosion control blankets, gravel,
vegetation (when appropriate), cold-millings, etc. during periods of inactivity
and properly anchor the cover.
 Soil retention: stabilize disturbed or exposed soil surface areas that will be inactive
for more than 30 days or while vegetation is being established.
ENGINEER’S STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned professional engineer in the State of New Mexico, do hereby certify that the
record information shown hereon is based on actual field measurements and visual
inspections performed by myself or under my direct supervision. I further certify that the
record condition as of is in substantial compliance with the approved grading and drainage
plan prepared by , dated .
Signature NMPE # Date

Form Updated: March 2024
Example for pond measurement post

Form Updated: April 2024
Development Review Team
(DRT) Comment Form
DRT Review Schedule – 9-12+ weeks*
Initial DRT Comments are due to the case planner within three weeks of the DRT Application Intake
meeting. Initial DRT review should confirm that the application is complete (i.e. Water Budget has been
submitted) and/or identify additional submittals or corrections (i.e. Water Budget needs revision). The
case planner will review and convey all Initial DRT Comments to the applicant via a Review Memo. The
applicant must respond to all Initial DRT Comments and submit a revised application for Final Review.
Final DRT Comments are due to the case planner within two weeks of receipt of the revised application.
The case planner will review and convey all Final DRT Comments to the applicant in a Final Review
Memo. The complete DRT Review Timeline can range from 9-12+ weeks, depending on the complexity
and quality of the application and the total number of applications under review.
Initial DRT
Comments
Review
Memo
Revised
Application
Final DRT
Comments
Timing of Conditions of Approval + Technical Corrections
While all DRT conditions of approval and technical corrections must be met by the applicant, the timing
of compliance varies. In the “Must be completed by” column in the following tables, please time your
conditions of approval and technical corrections to the following development review stages:
a. Prior to Public Hearing – these conditions/technical corrections must be addressed before the
case may move forward to the public hearing phase of the Development Review Process.
b. Prior to Recordation – these conditions/technical corrections may be resolved after the public
hearing but must be addressed before the Development Plan or Subdivision plat is recorded.
c. Prior to Building Permit Approval – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed
during the building permit review process, but prior to issuance of the permit.
d. During Construction – these conditions/technical corrections can be addressed during
construction.
Development Review Process Flow Chart
*See the 2024 Development Review Schedule for
details DRT Review Timeline:
Final
Review
Memo
Application Received DRT Application Intake DRT Initial Review Comments Due

Form Updated: April 2024
Date: May 1, 2026
DRT Member: Geronimo Griego, Fire Marshal
Dept/Div: Fire Prevention Division
Case No.: 2025-11753_2025-11756_1802 Cerrillos_EmpireStorage_DP_SUP (3rd
Review) Case Planner: Alexa Hempel-Senior Planner
Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections Tables
Review by this division/department has determined that this application will meet applicable standards
if the following Conditions of Approval and Technical Corrections are met:
Case #
Conditions of Approval: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1. Shall comply with the most currently adopted
International Fire Code (IFC) and adopted
city ordinances upon building permit
approval.
Prior to Building
Permit Approval
2. Shall maintain access to apparatus access roads
in and around construction sites. Complying IFC
2021, Chapter 33 Fire Safety and During
Construction and Demolition.
During Construction
3.
4.
5.
6.
Technical Corrections: Must be completed by: Applicant response**:
1.
2.
3.
4.
**The Applicant must respond to the condition of approval or technical correction, indicating they have met the
requirement and providing a reference in their revised submittals. If the applicant has not met the requirement,
they must indicate as much and provide a response.
The applicant should be aware that the following code provisions or other requirements will apply to
future phases of development of this project:
1. [list any additional items]
2.
Explanation of Conditions or Corrections (if needed):
1.