People

Santa Fe Minutes is a free, independent tool that brings together the calendar, agendas, document packets, and meeting minutes for the City of Santa Fe — all in one place so residents can follow local government more easily.

Meeting archiveSearch transcriptsSponsorGet the briefingContact us

Regular Governing Body Meeting - Last Wednesday — Wed, Jul 29, 2026 · 17.a Written Public Comment

Public Comment - Emily Wolf

  • View original PDF
  • Plain-text extract
Santa Fe Minutes document ID
10792
Government source ID
10792
Original filename
Public Comment - Emily Wolf
Meeting ID
933
Agenda item ID
21630
SHA-256
a77e5b29fc2d3d8bf7a4c2b2c4662f5b27ac1745c04581b7c72bbde085cb1c0d
Revision
1
First discovered
2026-09-15T18:42:40.230Z
Last checked
2026-09-15T18:45:05.232Z

Extracted text

1
VIGIL, XAVIER I.
From: CARDENAS, GERALYN F.
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 4:41 PM
To: VIGIL, XAVIER I.
Subject: FW: Please consider delaying vote to amend Santa Fe City Code 25-1.9A, Fishing Events
in the Municipal Watershed
Jabs,
Will you please add this public comment and if there are any others submitted by email to the packet?
Thanks,
G
Respectfully,
Geralyn
Geralyn F. Cardenas
City Clerk and Director of Community Engagement| City of Santa Fe
P.O. Box 909 |Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504
505-955-6519 | gfcardenas@santafenm.gov
From: Emily Wolf <emily.kwolf26@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2026 4:31 PM
To: Emily Wolf <emily.kwolf26@gmail.com>
Subject: Please consider delaying vote to amend Santa Fe City Code 25-1.9A, Fishing Events in the Municipal Watershed
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Good evening, Mayor Garcia and member of the Governing Body,
As a resident of Santa Fe with longtime professional and personal involvement in watershed and river
restoration and health in the upper watershed, urban reach, and lower watershed of Santa Fe, I am
writing to ask you to consider delaying the vote to amend City Code 25-1.9A, to allow for adequate time

2
for consideration and feedback by City departments, committees, partner organizations, and other key
stakeholders.
With unintended ripple effects from this code change a possibility, it is critical that area stakeholders,
including the Pueblo of Tesuque, are consulted from early in the process. It appears that no information
has been made available to members of the Governing Body or other relevant City committees in the
lead-up to this vote, even with its passage through two committees with no further discussion or
informational presentations. Other relevant committees, including the River Commission and Water
Conservation Committee, have not been given the opportunity to provide feedback.
If the vote proceeds this evening, I ask that language in the code be amended to include the following
prerequisites for Governing Body approval of any fishing event in the Municipal Watershed:
- Proactive consultation by Pueblo of Tesuque and US Forest Service
- Proactive engagement/vetting by other key stakeholders
- Proactive engagement/vetting by relevant City committees, including but not limited to the Water
Conservation Committee and the River Commission
- Detailed educational plan aligned with current best practices and priority themes such as climate
change, ecological conditions, and stewardship
- Detailed feasibility document for any proposed event, including
- Alternate options and reasons they are not feasible, including:
 Robust and transparent emergency management plan
 Detailed transportation plan that considers all easements, permits, and legal ramifications
 Transparent calculation of financial cost and future financial risk, where the funds are coming
from, and how the event will be staffed
 Potential environmental and social risks and corresponding mitigation measures such as:
o Introduction of whirling disease, black snot algae, and other contaminants not currently in
the water supply
o Direct and indirect fire risk
o Risk of future and ongoing trespassing, and its relation to water contamination and fire risk
o Risk of political controversy
I respectfully ask that you consider the possibility of adverse impacts from opening the upper watershed
to uses not permitted in decades.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment,
Emily Wolf
7657488060