Regular Governing Body Meeting - Last Wednesday — Wed, Jul 29, 2026 · 18.a CONSIDERATION OF BILL NO. 2026-14. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2026-___. (Councilor Jamie Cassutt and Councilor Patricia Feghali)A Bill Amending Section 14-7.9, SFCC 1987, to Clarify a Park Impact Fee Exemption as it Relates to Certain Construction Permits. (Janice Biletnikoff, Long-Range Strategic Planner; jibiletnikoff@santafenm.gov) Committee Review:Governing Body (Introduction): 07/08/2026Governing Body (Public Comment): 07/29/2026Public Works and Utilities Committee: 08/03/2026Finance Committee: 08/10/2026Governing Body (Public Hearing): 08/26/2026
FISCAL IMPACT REPORT General Information: (Check) Bill: x Resolution: Short Title(s): Technical Amendment – Park Impact Fee Exemption Sponsor(s): Councilor Jamie Cassutt and Councilor Patricia Feghali Reviewing Department(s): Land Use Department, City Attorney’s Office Staff Completing FIR: Janice Biletnikoff, Long-Range Strategic Planner Date: 6/24/2026 Phone: 505-699-4217 Reviewed by City Attorney: Date: Reviewed by Finance Director: Date: Summary: The proposed amendment to SFCC 1987, Section 14-7.9(E) clarifies the applicability of an exemption to park impact fees. Specifically, construction permits for new residential units that are part of a master plan, development plan, or subdivision plat where land is dedicated to the city to provide park land may be exempt from park impact fees, but are not exempt from impact fees for roads, police and fire. Departments Affected: Planning and Land Use Department Consequences of Not Enacting Legislation: If this legislation is not adopted, the potential exists for confusion in the application and calculation of impact fees, including but not limited to park impact fees. If the recently-adopted language is not clarified, the City could lose revenue from impact fees on large development projects wherein the developer claims they are exempt from all impact fees in Section 14-7.9, due to the dedication of park land as part of their project. Conflict, Duplication, Companionship, or Relationship to Other Legislation: Related to Ordinance No. 2025-25, which adopted the comprehensive rewrite of Chapter 14 of SFCC 1987. Performance and Administrative Implications: None at this time. Fiscal Implications: See “Consequences of Not Enacting Legislation” above. Even as there is no fiscal impact related to the adoption of the proposed bill itself, it is important to note the potential loss of revenue, should a lack of clarity for collecting park impact fees continue. FIR No. 10765.0Marcos Martinez (Jul 1, 2026 13:59:56 MDT) Marcos Martinez07/01/202607/01/2026 Adopted: 01/12/05; revised 8/24/05; 4/17/08; 2 Fiscal Impact X Check here if no fiscal impact Expenditures Expenditure Narrative: Revenue Revenue Type FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 Recurring (R) or Non-recurring (NR) Fund General Fund $ $______ $ Special Revenue $ $ $ CIP $ $ $ Enterprise $ $ $ Internal Service $ $ $ Trust and Agency Federal $ $ $ $ $ $ Other $ $ $ Total $ $ $ Revenue Narrative: Expenditure Type FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 Require BAR (Y/N) Recurring (R) or Non- recurring (NR) Fund 3-Year Total Cost Personnel and Benefits* $ $ $ Capital Outlay $ $ $ Contractual/ Professional Services $ $ $ Operating $ $ $ $ Total: $ $ $ $ Signature:Email:Signature:Email:hllamboy@santafenm.govjibiletnikoff@santafenm.gov