Ethics and Campaign Review Board

Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2025

Time: 3:00 PM

Last synced 118d ago

Meeting Documents (3)

09-05-25 ECRB Agenda

AgendaPosted 9/5/2025

09-05-25 ECRB Packet

Agenda PacketPosted 9/5/2025

09-11-25 Ethics and Campaign Review Board Meeting Minutes

MinutesPosted 11/17/2025

Agenda Items (15)

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Approval of Agenda

4. Approval of Minutes

5. Discussion and Possible Action Items

5-a. Case #2025-1.

Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a...

Case #2025-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987.

Case #2025-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987. (2)

Case #2025-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987. (3)

Case #2025-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987. (4)

Case #2025-1. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987. (5)

5-b. Case #2025-2.

Case #2025-2. Complaint Brought Forward by Victoria Murphy – In Accordance with Section 6-16.4 SFCC 1987 “Determination of Legal Sufficiency; Setting a Hearing.” Consideration of Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts which, if True Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. (The Board May Go Into Executive Session Under NMSA 1978, Section 10-15-1(H)(3) to Deliberate in Connection with an Administrative Adjudicatory Proceeding.)1. Discussion of Actions. 2. Action Regarding Whether the Complaint Sets Forth Legally Sufficient Facts, Which, if True, Show Probable Cause to Believe there was a Violation. 3. Action on Any Steps as Permitted Under Section 6-16 SFCC 1987.

6. Discussion No Action Items

6-a. Potential Revisions to City of Santa Fe Ethics Code.

7. Public Comment

8. Executive Session

9. Matters from Staff

10. Matters from the Committee

11. Matters from the Chair

12. Adjourn

Ethics and Campaign Review Board

Meeting Documents (3)

09-05-25 ECRB Agenda

09-05-25 ECRB Packet

09-11-25 Ethics and Campaign Review Board Meeting Minutes

Agenda at a Glance

Agenda Items (15)

Meeting Documents (3)

09-05-25 ECRB Agenda

09-05-25 ECRB Packet

09-11-25 Ethics and Campaign Review Board Meeting Minutes

Agenda at a Glance

Agenda Items (15)